Bonds and Interest Rates

Posted On March 31, 2023 By Scott Stratton, CFP(R), CFA In Portfolio Management /

How are Bonds and Interest Rates correlated? Bonds move inversely from Interest Rates. When rates rise, the price of bonds fall. This simple fact led to the downfall of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank this month. Banks invest your deposits in bonds and earn a spread on the difference between what they pay you and the bonds they buy. Banks are not vaults with piles of cash – they are bond investors. That is their business model.

In 2020, these banks bought long-term bonds with yields of 1-2 percent. Fast forward to 2023, and yields are now 4-5 percent on the same bonds, and some of those bonds are now trading at 90 cents on the dollar. A bank with $10 Billion in these bonds now has a paper loss of $1 Billion.

If they can hold to maturity, these bonds will return back to their full value. But if a large number of depositors all want their money out today, the banks have to sell their bonds for a huge loss. And if that loss is large enough, the bank becomes insolvent and doesn’t have enough assets to cover their deposits.

Bank Failures

When a bank fails, the FDIC steps in and seizes the bank. What is remarkable about these two bank failures in March is the size of the losses. These two banks represent $319 Billion in assets, which makes 2023 the second worst year ever for the FDIC, and it’s only March. In 2008, bank failures totaled $373 Billion in assets. So it is easy to see how bad things could get in 2023, if two bank failures in March almost reached the losses of the Global Financial Crisis of 2008.

These banks are collateral damage from rising interest rates, thanks to the Federal Reserve. The Fed held rates for too low for too long after the start of the pandemic, and helped create the accelerating inflation. Now they are raising rates to slow the economy.

While the Federal Reserve did set this in motion, the poor risk management at the Banks should bear the brunt of the blame. We have been talking for several years about reducing the duration of our bond holdings and lowering our interest rate risk. And I thought everyone else was doing the same, it seemed pretty obvious to me. But no, there were banks buying these long bonds which were just waiting to get crushed. When customers realized the size of bank losses, they pulled their deposits and there was a run on the bank. Could other banks follow? Maybe. If customers pull out their deposits en mass, it is possible.

I am not terribly concerned about this spreading to other banks, because the Fed has launched a new program. The Bank Term Funding Program will provide loans to banks so that they can hold on to their longer dated Treasury bonds and not have to sell for a loss. It will provide liquidity so that the banks can hold these bonds for longer. And like other government programs, I can see this program being expanded and made permanent.

It is remarkable to me how much of our news today has its roots in bonds and interest rates. The bank crisis, inflation, recession, unemployment, retirement programs, real estate and mortgages, etc. These are all linked. What should the individual investor do? Here are our thoughts:

FDIC Coverage

I would never have more than $250,000 at any bank and exceed the FDIC coverage limits. I heard about a corporate subsidiary that had tens of millions at SVB, which failed last month. Luckily, it looks like the FDIC has arranged for all of those large account holders of SVB to be made whole. But I would not just assume that FDIC coverage is now unlimited. Instead of exceeding FDIC limits:

You could use more than one bank and stay under FDIC limits.
We can buy brokerage CDs from multiple banks in your Ameritrade account. Each issuer will carry $250,000 of FDIC coverage. Today we have 6-month CDs at 5%. Investors are often surprised that I can show them much better yields from Chase or Wells Fargo than they can get at their local branch.
Ladder Treasury Bills. There are maturities every week. Treasury bonds are high quality and the most liquid market in the world.

Bond Strategies

Our core holdings for bonds consist of owning individual bonds laddered from 1-5 years. We buy investment grade bonds including Agency Bonds, Treasuries, Corporate, Municipal, and CDs. Today, the yield on Agency bonds is very competitive with Corporates. And CDs are yielding higher than Treasuries.

With today’s yields, I would avoid taking on significant credit risk. We are not buying any junk bonds, and have sold our Floating Rate bonds. In addition to rising interest rates, we are seeing liquidity problems in some areas of the bond market. It may become difficult or impossible for some low credit quality companies to refinance their debt in 2023 and 2024. It is probable that defaults will rise, another casualty of the Federal Reserve heading the economy towards a likely recession.

Inverted Yield Curve

While the Fed raised the Fed Funds rate 0.25% at their March meeting, the bond market moved the opposite direction. Over the past month, the 2-year Treasury has actually fallen from 4.89% on March 1, to as low as 3.76% on March 23rd. The bond market remains inverted, with the 2-year yields higher than the 10-year yields. This is a strong historical predictor of recession. The bond market is priced as if the Federal Reserve will begin cutting interest rates in 2023, which is not what Jerome Powell is saying at all. The Fed’s commentary shows that they anticipate raising rates to 5.10% (from the current 4.75-5.00%) by year end. The movement in the bond market is bearish for the economy and stocks.

So now there is the potential for the opposite movement of the bond see-saw. If rates do go down this year or next, bond prices will rise. If we enter a recession, investors will want to shift towards safety and the Fed will lower rates. This would be a good time to have longer duration bonds with higher credit quality. And so we have begun buying longer bonds, 7-15 years. And if nothing happens and we just hold these bonds, we have yields to maturity of 6%. That is also a good outcome, an alternative to stocks, which have a similar expected return today.

In spite of seeing losses in bonds in 2022, looking forward, bond returns look strong. Still, it is crucial to be mindful of the risks and to take steps to mitigate them. Here are some additional ways to improve safety in a bond portfolio:

Diversify Across Different Types of Bonds

It’s important to diversify across different types of bonds, such as corporate, municipal, and government bonds, as well as across different industries and sectors. This can help reduce the impact of any one bond issuer or industry experiencing difficulties.

Consider Active Bond Management

Active bond management can help adjust the portfolio to changing market conditions and credit risks. It may be worth considering investing in low-cost actively managed bond funds or working with an investment advisor who specializes in bond management.

Monitor Interest Rate Risks

Investors should keep a close eye on interest rate risks and how they may impact their bond portfolio. The longer the duration of the bond, the greater the impact of interest rate fluctuations. Investors may want to consider laddering their bonds to manage interest rate risks.

Use Credit Ratings as a Guide

Credit ratings can provide a guide to the creditworthiness of a bond issuer. Investors should be wary of bonds with lower credit ratings, as they may carry higher risks of default. However, it’s important to remember that credit ratings are not infallible and can sometimes be inaccurate.

In conclusion, while bonds can offer attractive yields and provide diversification to a high net worth investor’s portfolio, it’s important to be mindful of the risks and take steps to mitigate them. By diversifying across different types of bonds, actively managing the portfolio, monitoring interest rate risks, and using credit ratings as a guide, investors can help reduce their exposure to potential losses. Keeping cash in a bank may not be as safe as you might assume, especially if you exceed FDIC coverage. And why have cash earning next to nothing when you could be making 4-5% in short term CDs or Treasury Bills?

Within our strategic asset allocation models, we actually spend more time on managing our bond holdings than our stock holdings. Why? Because it’s that important, and it is an area where we believe we can add more value with our time. Interest Rates are in the news and there are a lot of risks today. Risk is often defined as a danger, but risk can also mean opportunity. We are seeing both dangers and opportunities in 2023, and you can bet there will continue to be a lot of headlines about Bonds and Interest Rates.

Q3 Portfolio Results

Posted On October 2, 2022 By Scott Stratton, CFP(R), CFA In Portfolio Management /

Q3 Portfolio Results are in and no surprise, it’s ugly. Today we are going to dive into the numbers and give a realistic overview of the situation. More importantly, we are going to share some reasons for optimism, or at least patience. And we will discuss the remarkable situation being created from currencies and interest rates.

Market Returns YTD

We use two benchmarks to design and evaluate our portfolios. For stocks, we look at the MSCI World Index, using the ETF ticker ACWI. For bonds, we use the Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index, or AGG. Year to date through September 30, the total return of ACWI was -25.72% and the total return of AGG was -14.38. (Source: Morningstar.com)

Our portfolios are a blend of stocks and bonds. For example Moderate is 60/40, which has a benchmark of 60% stocks in ACWI and 40% bonds in AGG. Your hypothetical, benchmark returns YTD are as follows:

Conservative 35/65: -18.35%
Balanced 50/50: -20.05%
Moderate 60/40: -21.18%
Growth 70/30: -22.32%
Aggressive 85/15: -24.02%
Ultra Equity 100/00: -25.72%

Category Performance

This has been a difficult environment. We are doing a couple of points better than our benchmarks across our portfolios, net of fees. Our move to shorter duration bonds and floating rate at the beginning of the year was a positive. And our Value funds have lost less than the overall market. No doubt, it has been a tough year for investors and I am not happy with our results.

Q3 deepened the Bear Market in stocks and extended losses in bonds with rising interest rates. Commodities, which were up dramatically in Q1, reversed in Q3. Thankfully, we have been well positioned in our bonds which has been our primary area of defense.

International stocks are down more than US Stocks and this has detracted from our returns. A large component of the loss in International stocks is due to the currency exchange. The dollar is up 16% to the Euro, and the dollar is up 25% to the Japanese Yen. So, even if a European stock was flat on its price in Euros, it would be a 16% loss in dollars.

Don’t Time The Market

When the market is up, and I say that we don’t time the market, everyone nods in agreement. But when stocks are down 25%, even the steeliest investor may want to throw in the towel. It’s natural and it’s human nature. It’s also the worst thing an investor can do.

But Scott, this time is different!

The economic outlook is terrible. The Federal Reserve is determined to crush inflation regardless of the short-term pain it inflicts on the economy. The 30-year mortgage hit 7% this week. Corporate earnings are starting to decline and consumer confidence is plunging.

Yes, all this is true. But, the stock market is a leading indicator. Stocks move ahead of economic data and investors aim to predict what will happen. Even if markets are not perfectly efficient, it is possible that a lot of the future economic woes are already priced into stocks. Stocks typically rebound before we fully exit a recession.

I am not making light of the severity of the current market impact or the economic situation which faces the world. But when we see the historic graphs of when the stock market was down 25% and where it was a few years later, it is pretty obvious that we should to stay on course.

In fact, I have spent a lot of time kicking myself for not being more aggressive in March of 2020, when we had such an amazing buying opportunity. But these opportunities are only obvious in hindsight. In real time, these feel like horrible, painful times to be an investor. Selling didn’t work in 2002, 2008, or 2020. Those were years to stay invested, so you could recover in 2003, 2009, or the second half of 2020.

International Stocks Improving

Q3 has been especially tough for international stocks and they’ve fared even worse than US stocks. Shouldn’t we focus more on the high-quality US companies then? After all, the dollar continues to go up. Why fight that trend?

There are going to be future ramifications of the strong dollar. Besides that it’s a great time to go visit Europe or Japan, let’s think through the implications of a strong dollar. For US companies, a strong dollar hurts us. It makes our exports more expensive to the rest of the world. And it makes the foreign profits of US companies look smaller. (Almost half of the profits from the S&P 500 index comes from foreign sales.) Over time, a strong dollar will hurt the US stock market.

On the other hand, the strong dollar can benefit foreign companies. As US imports become more expensive, they can gain local market share. Their products are now cheaper to US consumers and we buy more imported goods. They sell more and have higher profits.

This creates a leveling mechanism where currencies may tend to pull back towards each other rather than continue to widen apart. A stronger dollar will help Europeans (including through our increased tourism), and those international companies will see their profits grow. When the dollar eventually weakens, that currency headwind will become a tailwind, pushing foreign stocks higher. I don’t know when the dollar will reverse, but based on their improving fundamentals, I don’t think now is the time to give up on international stocks.

No More ZIRP, Bye Bye TINA

In 2008, central banks reduced interest rates to zero to save the global economy. For the next 11 or so years, we had a Zero Interest Rate Policy, nicknamed ZIRP. The US had just begun to test the waters of moving up from 0%, when COVID-19 hit. And we went right back to 0% and piled on unprecedented stimulus to the economy.

The stimulus worked. It worked so well, in fact, that we created 8-10% inflation around the world this year. And so now, central banks are raising rates around the world. Last week, I wrote about being able to buy a 5% US government agency bond for the first time in over a decade. It’s a game changer.

For the past 14 years, 0% interest rates meant that There Is No Alternative to stocks. You simply could not invest in bonds. It became such a reality, that it became its own acronym. Like FOMO or LOL, every advisor knew TINA meant There Is No Alternative. Well, bye bye TINA, because bonds are back.

Bond yields are up and we can now buy high quality bonds with 4-6% yields. At those rates, we have a very real alternative to stocks. While we patiently wait for an eventual stock market recovery, we can buy attractive bonds right now. We are laddering our bonds from 1 through 5 years and will hold bonds to maturity. For clients with established withdrawals or Required Minimum Distributions, we are buying bonds to meet those needs over the next five years.

Discouraging but not Discouraged

Q3 has been rough, especially September. All the expectations about weak Septembers and mid-cycle election years certainly came true in 2022. I know the markets are incredibly disappointing right now, looking back over the last nine months. Both the stock and bond markets have double digit losses for 2022. I don’t think that has ever happened before and it means diversification hasn’t been much help.

We did make a few beneficial choices at the beginning of the year, with short-term bonds and Value stocks. Looking forward, there are reasons to be optimistic. Historically, after a 25% drop, stocks are usually higher 12 months later, and often see a double digit gain. Our international stocks have been hammered by the strong dollar. But that may ultimately be beneficial for foreign companies and the dollar may even reverse. Bonds yields are up and now there is a real alternative to stocks. (Can I coin TIARA, there is a real alternative? You heard it here first…)

No doubt these are frustrating times. I feel your pain and I am in the same boat, personally invested in our Aggressive Model. We’ve seen this before – Bear Markets in 2020, 2008, and 2000, and many before that. In fact, before 2000, Bear Markets were about once every four years. And one of three years in the market is down, historically. Every one of these drops feels unique and like the sky is falling. And in time, they work out eventually. I am looking at the markets daily and am ready to make adjustments. But sometimes, the sailor has to sail through the storm to reach their destination and it’s all part of the journey. We need patience, but also to keep asking questions and thinking long-term.

Bonds in 2022

Posted On December 12, 2021 By Admin In Portfolio Management /

Resuming last week’s Investment Themes, today we consider Bonds in 2022. It is a challenging environment for bond investors. We are coming off record low yields and the yield on the 10-year Treasury is still only 1.5%. At the same time, yields are starting to move up. And since prices move inversely to yields, the US Aggregate Bond index ETF (AGG) is actually down 1.74% year to date. Even including the yield, you’ve lost money in bonds this year. With stocks having a great year in 2021, it is frustrating to see bonds dragging down the returns of a diversified portfolio.

Inflation Hurts Bonds

Inflation is picking up in the US and globally. Supply chain issues, strong demand for goods, and rising labor costs are increasing prices. The Federal Reserve this week said they would be removing the word “transitory” from their description of inflation. And now that it appears that Jay Powell will remain the Chair, it is believed that the Fed will focus on lowering inflation in 2022. They will reduce their bond buying program which has suppressed interest rates. And they are expected to gradually start increasing the Fed Funds rate in 2022.

It is difficult to make accurate predictions about interest rates, but the consensus is that rates will continue to rise in 2022. So, on the one hand, bonds have very little yield to offer. And on the other hand, you will lose money if interest rates continue to climb. Then, to add insult to injury, most bonds are not maintaining your purchasing power with inflation at 6%.

Bond Themes for 2022

There aren’t a lot of great options for bond investors today. But here are the bond investment themes we believe will benefit your portfolio for the year ahead. This is how we are positioning portfolios

We will be increasing our allocation to Floating Rate bonds (“Bank Loans”). These are bonds with adjustable interest rates. As rates rise, the interest charged goes up. These are a good Satellite for rising rate environments.
Within core bonds, we want to reduce duration to shorter term bonds. This can reduce interest rate risk.
We continue to hold Preferred Stocks for their yield. While their prices will come under pressure if rates rise, they offer a continuous cash flow.
Ladder 5-year fixed annuities. I have been beating this drum for years. Still, multi-year guaranteed annuities (MYGA) have higher yields than CDs, Treasuries, or A-rated corporate and municipal bonds. If you don’t need the liquidity, MYGAs offer a guaranteed yield and principal.
I previously suggested I-Series Savings Bonds rather than TIPS. These are linked to inflation and presently are paying 7.12%. Purchases are limited to $10,000 a year per person, and unfortunately cannot be held in a brokerage account or an IRA. Read my recent article for more details. I personally bought $10,000 of I-Bonds this week.

Purpose of Bonds

Even with a negative environment for bonds, they still have a role in most portfolios. Unless you have the risk capacity to be 100% in stocks, bonds offer crucial diversification. When we have a portfolio with 60% stocks and 40% bonds, we have an opportunity to rebalance. When stocks are down, like in March of 2020, we can use bonds to buy more stocks while they are on sale. And of course, a portfolio with 40% in bonds has much less volatility than one which has 100% stocks.

Yields may eventually go back up to more normal levels. While it would be nice to have higher yields, the process of yields going up will be painful for bond investors. Our themes are trying to reduce this “interest rate risk”. We hope to reset to higher rates in the future, while reducing a potential loss in bond prices in 2022.

Do You Need Bonds?

Posted On September 6, 2020 By Scott Stratton, CFP(R), CFA In Portfolio Management /

With ultra low yields today, more investors are asking if you really need to have bonds in your portfolio. It’s going to depend on your objectives for your overall plan. First, let’s take a look at expected returns and how this impacts your allocation.

The primary role of bonds is to reduce the risk of a stock portfolio. Bonds fluctuate a lot less and most are relatively low risk. The trade-off is that they have a lot lower return than stocks. Of course, the stock market has a negative return in approximately one of every five or so years. From 1950 through 2019, 15 of 70 years had a negative return in the S&P 500 Index. Bonds are more consistent, and they can help smooth out your overall returns. In years when stocks are down, you can rebalance by selling some bonds and buying stocks.

The more bonds you have, the more you reduce stock risk, but also the more you probably lower your long-term returns. With the 10-year Treasury bond yielding only 0.721% this week, bonds offer almost no return on their own. Bonds used to offer safety and income, but today, you are really only owning them just for safety.

Portfolio Asset Allocation

We describe a portfolio by the percentage it has in stocks versus bonds. A 70/30 portfolio, for example, has 70% stocks and 30% bonds. Our asset allocation models target different levels of stock and bond exposure:

Ultra Equity (100% Equity)
Aggressive (85/15)
Growth (70/30)
Moderate (60/40)
Balanced (50/50)
Conservative (35/65)

Expected Returns

Next, let’s consider what Vanguard projects for the next 10 years for annualized asset returns, as of June 2020:

US Equities: 5.5% to 7.5%
International Equities: 8.5% to 10.5%
US Aggregate Bond Market: 0.9% to 1.9%

Let’s calculate hypothetical portfolio returns using these assumptions. If we take the midpoint of stock projected returns, we have 6.5% for US Stocks and 9.5% for International Stocks. If we invest equally in both, we’d have an 8% return. For our bond return, we will take the midpoint of 1.4%. Now, here’s a simple blend of those expected returns when we combine them in a portfolio.

Portfolio	Projected 10 Year Return
100% Equities	8.00%
90% Equities / 10% Bonds	7.34%
80% Equities / 20% Bonds	6.68%
70% Equities / 30% Bonds	6.02%
60% Equities / 40% Bonds	5.36%
50% Equities / 50% Bonds	4.70%
40% Equities / 60% Bonds	4.04%
30% Equities / 70% Bonds	3.38%
20% Equities / 80% Bonds	2.72%
10% Equities / 90% Bonds	2.06%
100% Bonds	1.40%

If you simply want the highest return without regard to volatility in a portfolio, you could invest 100% into stocks. Moreover, any addition of bonds should reduce your long-term returns. Of course, this assumes that returns are simply linear. In a real portfolio, there would be up years and down years in stocks. That’s when you would rebalance, which could be beneficial.

For young investors, in their 20’s, 30’s, or 40’s, you probably should be more aggressive in your asset allocation. For some, it may even make sense to be 100% in stocks. If you have 20 or more years to retirement, and aren’t scared of stock market fluctuations, being aggressive is likely going to offer the highest return.

The 10-year expected return of stocks is not bad, 8% combined today. That’s a little bit lower than the historical averages, but still an attractive return. Bond returns, however, are expected to be very weak. Consequently, 60/40, 50/50, and more conservative portfolios, are expected to have much lower projected returns.

Retirement Planning and Your Need for Bonds

For those closer to retirement, low yields are a challenge. You want to have less volatility but also want good returns. If you are within five years of retirement, you probably want to reduce the risk of a stock market crash hurting your retirement income. Now, if the hypothetical 8% stock returns were guaranteed, our decision would be easy. But getting out of bonds today, with the market at an all time high, seems too risky. This week has certainly been a reminder that stocks are volatile.

I think most pre-retirees will want to keep their current allocation through their retirement date. After that, they may want to consider gradually reducing their bond exposure by selling bonds. There is evidence that this strategy, The Rising Equity Glidepath, is a beneficial way to access retirement withdrawals. It allows retirees to benefit from the higher expected return of stocks, while reducing their risks in the crucial 5-10 years right before and at the beginning of retirement.

Some retirees have a high risk capacity if they have ample sources of income and significant assets. If their time horizon is focused on their children or grandchildren, they can also consider a more aggressive allocation.

We want to calculate your asset mix individually. I wanted to show you what the blend of stocks and bonds is projected to return over the next decade. We’ve had strong returns from fixed income in recent years because falling interest rates push up bond prices. Going forward, it looks like bond returns are going to be quite low. We do have to consider these projected returns when making allocation decisions.

If you’re looking for advice on managing your investment portfolio today, let’s talk. Our planning process will help you address these questions and have a better understanding of your options.

How to Increase Your Yield

Posted On August 2, 2020 By Scott Stratton, CFP(R), CFA In Portfolio Management /

Opportunities for a Low Yield World, Part 2

Last week, we discussed how not to increase your yield today: by replacing safe bonds with high yield bonds. That’s because the potential for rising defaults today in junk bonds could have a major drag on what would otherwise appear to be a healthy yield. While the typical default rate for single-B and double-B bonds is 2-4% a year, in a crisis it could go much higher. In 2009, for example, global high yield bonds saw a 13% default rate that year.

It’s important to understand the risks in your bond portfolio and know what you own. There are four opportunities today for investors to improve their yields today, without simply trading down to junk bonds. None of these are home runs, but offer a bit more yield. And in the current low interest rate environment, increasing your yield by even one percent could be doubling your rate of return from your bonds. Some investors will choose to skip bonds altogether and add to their equities, but that would take on a lot of additional risk. For investors who want the risk and return profile of say a 60/40 portfolio, there’s no substitute for the safety of bonds.

1. Cash: Online Savings Account, not a Money Market Fund

Today, the Federal Reserve has lowered rates to basically zero. There is almost no yield on T-Bills, bank accounts, and short-term CDs. I see a lot of investors who park significant cash in a money market fund or in a Bank savings account. Those rates may have been near two percent a year ago, but many are now at 0.01%. That’s a whole one dollar of interest for a $10,000 investment each year! Not only are you not growing your cash, you probably aren’t going to keep up with inflation either. Your purchasing power is likely to decline with each passing year.

Instead of a money market at 0.01%, park your cash in an online savings account. You can link it to your primary checking account, and transfer money as needed. Most are FDIC insured, and several have no account minimums and no monthly fees. The one I use: Marcus.com from Goldman Sachs Bank. The current rate is 1.05%, with no minimums and no fees. You can open an account in about 1 minute and there’s an app for iOS and Android. I cannot think of any reason to not do this if you are presently earning 0.01% on a money market.

2. Buy Insured Municipal Bonds, not Taxable Corporates

The Coronavirus didn’t just hurt companies. Municipal Bonds – which are issued by cities, states, schools, and local entities – depend on taxes or revenues. Revenues from Stadiums, Toll Roads, etc., are down and so are taxes from sales, restaurants and bars, gasoline, income, and everything else which is taxed. The municipal bond market really doesn’t know how to evaluate this unprecedented problem. Compounding this issue is the fact that there are hundreds of thousands of different bonds, issued by 50,000 different entities. Some of these bonds are so small that they rarely trade.

The result is that we can now buy a tax-free, A-rated municipal bond with a higher yield than we can buy an A-rated corporate bond which is taxable. This doesn’t help retirement accounts, like a 401(k) or IRA, but if you are buying bonds in a taxable account, taxes matter. Imagine two bonds both yield 2%. One is tax-free and the other one is going to cost you 22 to 37 percent in income taxes. That’s a big difference when we consider after-tax returns!

It is unusual to find yields on tax-free municipal bonds being higher than on corporate bonds of a similar credit quality and duration. For folks in a high tax bracket, taking profits on your corporate bonds and shifting to munis can make sense. (Profits on your appreciated, high-priced corporate bonds can qualify for long-term capital gains rate of 15%, a lower tax rate than receiving the bond’s income and waiting for them to mature at par.)

If you are concerned about the credit quality of municipal bonds, look for bonds which are insured. Bond insurers offer protection to muni bond holders to cover losses of income and principal, should a municipality default. At this point, defaults on municipal bonds remain much lower than from corporate bonds. The highest rated insurer is AGMC, and those bonds remain AA- rated.

We build portfolios of individual municipal bonds for clients with taxable accounts over $250,000. For investors with smaller portfolios, you can achieve a similar benefit with an intermediate municipal bond fund.

3. Buy 5-year Fixed Annuities, not 5-year Bonds

Where are the yields of 5-year fixed income products this week? The 5-year Treasury bond has a yield of 0.27%. The best rate I have on a 5-year CD is 0.55%. I see an A- rated 5-year corporate bond from JP Morgan at 0.95%. Munis are better, but still only 1.0 to 1.3% tax-free for an A-rated bond.

The best place to park money for five years remains a fixed annuity. Today I see several annuities in the 3.0 and 3.1 percent range for a five year product. That’s basically triple the yield of corporates and about 6-times the yield from CDs. A fixed annuity is guaranteed, both for the rate of return and your principal. There is a trade-off with annuities. They charge very steep surrender charges if you need to access your money early. However, if you aren’t going to tap the account for 5+ years, it can make sense to put some money into an annuity.

Whenever people ask me how they can earn more while keeping their money safe, I discuss the pros and cons of an annuity. For today’s bond investors, a Multi-Year Guaranteed Annuity (MYGA) can be a way to increase your yield while keeping high credit quality.

4. Buy Preferred Stocks, Not a High Yield Fund

The High Yield ETF (HYG) currently has an SEC yield of 5.06%. There are a couple of reasons I prefer to own preferred stocks, besides the default risks I shared last week. First, I can save the ETF expense ratio of 0.49%. This is actually low compared to most high yield funds. When you own Preferreds directly, you might be saving one-half to one percent versus paying the expense ratio of a fund. At a 5% yield today, that is a 10-20% improvement. Yields are very low today, but expense ratios have not come down. Now, expenses eat up a larger portion of your return, leaving you with less income.

Second, preferreds today are offering a yield of 5-7%, which is attractive compared to bonds from the same company. For example, AT&T has preferred which yields 4.8% and is callable in 5 years. The February 2030 AT&T regular bond, however, yields less than 2.25% today. First Horizon Bank sold a 6.5% preferred this year, callable in five years. Their five year bonds, today, are available for a purchase with only a 1.865% yield.

Generally, the bonds are “safer” than preferreds, as they would rate higher in a bankruptcy liquidation. That’s one reason for the different yields, as well as the longer duration of the preferreds. Still, if you are comfortable with the credit risk of a company, the Preferreds may be trading at a significantly higher yield than the bonds of the company. That’s an opportunity today.

Why do we write so much about fixed income? For many of our investors who have achieved their accumulation goals, moving from growth into preservation and income is important. And there is an opportunity for us to add value through our fixed income choices: to increase yield, improve credit quality, or to reduce your risks. While it is relatively easy and fast to trade equity ETFs, buying individual bonds can require hours of research and trading.

Stocks have gotten all our attention this year, but don’t ignore your fixed income. The great return of fixed income in recent years has largely been the result of falling yields increasing the value/price of your bonds. Today, at nearly zero, yields could prove disappointing going forward. Our goal is to help you get more yield without simply taking on a lot of credit or duration risk.

Of these four ideas, you can certainly do #1 on your own. For #2 through #4, though, I think you will want to work with a financial professional. If you’d like to learn about individual municipal bonds, fixed annuities, or Preferred Stocks, please give me a call.

The High Yield Trap

Posted On July 24, 2020 By Scott Stratton, CFP(R), CFA In Financial Planning, Portfolio Management /

Opportunities for a Low Yield World PART 1

Everyone wants their investments to make more money, but we have to be careful to avoid the High Yield Trap. Since the Coronavirus Crash, central banks have been lowering interest rates to near zero. Last year, I was buying CDs at 2-3%. This week, I’m looking at the same CDs with yields of 0.1% to 0.2%. To which, my client innocently asks: What can we buy that will make more than a couple of percent with low risk?

Nothing, today. The five-year Treasury Bond currently yields 0.22%. That’s unacceptable for most investors, and it will push them out of safe fixed income, like Treasuries, CDs, and high quality municipal and corporate bonds. The yields are just too darn low.

Where will they go in pursuit of higher yields? Oh, there are plenty of bonds and bond funds with higher yields today. Credit quality has been plunging, as rating agencies are trying to keep up with downgrading firms that are being devastated by the shutdown or low commodity prices. In fact, through June 16, $88 Billion in BBB-rated bonds were downgraded to Junk Bond status this year. Each downgrade causes selling, which lowers the price of the bond, and the yield goes up (at least for new buyers).

Why It’s Called Junk

Before you get too excited, there are reasons to be concerned about buying lower grade bonds. In an average year, 2% of BB bonds and 4% of single-B rated bonds will default. That’s why high yield bonds are called junk bonds.

When those companies file for bankruptcy, the bond holders won’t be getting paid back their full principal. They will have to wait for a bankruptcy court to approve a restructuring plan or to dissolve the company. According to Moody’s, the median recovery is only 24 cents on the dollar when a bond defaults.

And while a 2-4% default rate might not sound too bad, that’s in an average year. In a crisis, that might rise to 8-10% defaults. In 2009, global high yield bonds had a 13% default rate in that year alone. These are historical rates, and it could be worse than that in the future. Additionally, the possibility of default increases as a company gets downgraded. If your BB-rated bond gets cut to CCC-rated, the chance of default is now a lot higher than 2%. And the price will probably go down, which creates a difficult choice. Do you sell for a loss or hold on hoping that the company can pay off your bond?

Here in Dallas, we are seeing a lot of companies go bankrupt, pushed over the edge by the Coronavirus. Big names like J.C. Penney, Neiman Marcus, Pier One, Chuck E. Cheese, Bar Louie, and others have filed for bankruptcy in 2020. Most of these companies were issuers of high yield bonds and had a lot of debt. When they got into trouble, they could not keep up with their debt payments and had to fold. Expect more retailers, oil companies, and restaurants to go under before the end of 2020. Bond holders in those companies could lose a lot. (In all fairness, stock holders will do even worse. There is usually zero recovery for stock holders in bankruptcy.)

Funds versus Individual Bonds

If you are investing in a high yield bond fund, you may own hundreds or thousands of bonds. The fund may have a 7 percent yield, but don’t get too excited. A high yield fund is not a CD. You are not guaranteed to get your principal back. It’s likely (even more likely in the current crisis), that your return will get dinged by 2-4% in defaults and losses due to credit downgrades.

If you own individual high yield bonds, it can be even more precarious. Either the bond defaults or it doesn’t. Having the potential for an 75% loss, while earning an average 5-7% annual yield, is dangerous game. Everything is fine until you have a default. A single loss can wipe out years of interest payments. That’s why I generally don’t want to buy individual high yield bonds for my clients.

The quoted yield of 5-7% for high yield bonds does not reflect that some of those bonds will default. If you consider a 2-4% default rate, your net return might be more like 3-5%. That’s the High Yield Trap. Your actual returns often fall short of the quoted yield.

High Yield bonds are issued by companies. Stocks are companies. If companies do poorly – really poorly – both the stocks and bonds can get walloped at the same time. That’s the opposite of diversification. We want bonds to hold up well when our stocks are doing poorly. In finance jargon, we would say that there is a high correlation between high yield bonds and stocks. We want a low correlation.

Instead of High Yield?

What I would suggest, if suitable for an investor, would be a 5-year fixed annuity at 3% today. That would give you a guaranteed rate of return and a guaranteed return of your principal. That’s not super exciting, but it’s what investors need from fixed income: stability and dependable income. Don’t buy bonds for speculation. And above all else, Bonds should avoid the possibility of massive losses.

Be wary of the High Yield Trap. The yields appear attractive in today’s super low interest rate environment. But let’s be careful and not take unnecessary high risks. All bonds are not created equal. When you reach for yield, you are taking on more risk. Defaults have the potential to drag down your performance in a fund. In individual bonds, they could almost wipe out your original investment.

High Yield bonds are not inherently bad. If you bought at the bottom in 2009, they recovered very well. But I am very concerned that today’s yields are actually not high enough to compensate for the potential risk of defaults. We’ve already started to see corporate bankruptcies in 2020 and it’s possible we will have above average defaults in the near future. Until we have a real fire sale in high yield bonds, I’d rather stay away.

We will discuss ways of improving your yield next week. Yes, it’s a low interest rate world, but there are ways we can incrementally improve your portfolio while maintaining good credit quality. We will also discuss financial planning strategies for low rates in an upcoming post. If you’d like a free evaluation of your portfolio, to better understand your risks, please send me a message for an online meeting.

A Bond Primer

Posted On January 13, 2019 By Scott Stratton, CFP(R), CFA In Portfolio Management /

We have been adding individual bonds and CDs across many accounts since December, as we looked to reduce our equity exposure and take advantage of higher yields now available in short-term, investment grade fixed income. When you are an owner of individual bonds, you are likely to encounter some terminology that may be new, even if you’ve been investing in bond funds for many years. Here are some important things to know:

Bonds are generally priced in $1,000 increments. One bond will mature at $1,000. However, instead of quoting bond prices in actual dollars, we basically use percentages. A bond priced at 100 (note, no dollar sign or percentage symbol is used) would cost $1,000. 100 is called its Par value. If you are buying newly issued bonds, they are generally issued at Par (100). This is called the Primary Market – where issuers directly sell their bonds to the public. We also buy bonds in the Secondary Market, which is where bond desks trade existing bonds between each other.

In the Secondary Market, bond prices are set by market participants. A bond priced at 98.50 would cost $985, and would be said to be at a discount to Par. A bond priced at 102 would cost $1,020, called a premium. As interest rates rise, the value of existing (lower yielding bonds) will fall. There is an inverse relationship between price and interest rates – when one rises, the other falls.

Bonds have a set Maturity date. That is when the issuer will return the $1,000 they borrowed from the bondholder and cancel the debt. Some bonds are also Callable, which means that the issuer has the right to buy the bond back before its maturity date. This benefits the company, but not the bondholder, because when interest rates are low, companies can refinance their debt to a lower rate.

Most bonds pay interest semi-annually (twice a year). We call this the Coupon. A bond with a 4% coupon would pay $20 in interest, twice a year. If the bond is priced exactly at Par, then the coupon is the same as the effective yield. However, if the bond is priced differently, we are more interested in its Yield to Maturity, commonly listed as YTM. This is very helpful for comparing bonds with different coupons.

Most bonds pay a fixed coupon, although some pay a step coupon, which rises over time, and others are floating, tied to an interest rate index, or inflation. When we purchase a bond between interest payments, the buyer will receive all of the next payment, so the buyer will also pay the seller Accrued Interest, which is the interest they have earned calculated to the day of sale.

For bonds which are callable, we also have the Yield to Call (YTC), which measures what your yield would be if the bond is called early. Generally, if we are buying a bond at a discount, Yield to Call is attractive. If we buy at 96 and they redeem at 100, that’s a good thing. But if we buy a bond at a premium, we need to carefully examine if or when it might be callable. Yield to Worst (YTW) will show the worst possible return, whether that is to maturity or to a specific call date.

Some bonds do not pay a coupon and are called Zero Coupon Bonds. Instead, they are issued at a discount and grow to 100 at maturity. Treasury Bills are the most common type of zero coupon bonds. US Government Bonds include Treasury Bills (under one year), Treasury Notes (1 to 10 years), and Treasury Bonds (10 to 30 years). There also are Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS), which are tied to the Consumer Price Index, and Agency Bonds, which are issued by government sponsored entities, such as Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.

In addition to Government Bonds, we also buy Corporate Bonds – those issued by public and private companies, Municipal Bonds issued by state and local governments, including school districts, and Certificates of Deposit (CDs) from Banks.

Most Municipal Bonds are tax exempt, at the Federal and possibly at the state level. If you live in New York, any Municipal Bond would be tax-free at the Federal Level, but only NY bonds would be tax-free for NY state income tax. In states with no income tax, such as Texas, a tax-exempt bond from any state will be tax-free for Federal Income Tax purposes.

To make their bonds more attractive, some municipal bonds are Insured, which means that if they were to default, a private insurance company would make investors whole. Those municipal insurers got in trouble in the previous financial crisis, and some are still weak today. My preferred insurer is Assured Guaranty (AGMC).

Please note that some Municipal Bonds are taxable; we sometimes buy these for retirement accounts. In addition to the types of bonds we’ve discussed, there are thousands of bonds issued outside of the US, in other currencies, but we do not purchase those bonds directly.

There are several agencies that provide credit ratings to assess the financial strength of the issuer. Standard and Poor’s highest rating is AAA, followed by AA+, AA, AA-, A+, A, A-, BBB+, BBB, BBB-. These are considered all Investment Grade. Below this level, from BB+ to C are below Investment Grade, often called High Yield or Junk Bonds. D means a bond has Defaulted. Moody’s ratings scale is slightly different: Aaa is the highest, followed by Aa1, Aa2, Aa3, A1, A2, A3, Baa1, Baa2, and Baa3 for Investment Grade. Junk Bonds include Ba(1,2,3), B(1,2,3), Caa(1,2,3), Ca, and C.

There are about 5,000 stocks issued in the US, but there are probably over a million individual bonds issued, each one identified by a unique CUSIP number. Every week, there are bonds which mature and new ones which are issued.

Our approach for individual bonds is to buy only investment grade bonds, and ladder them from one to five years with diversified issuers. We also sometimes invest in other types of bonds, such as floating rate bonds, mortgage backed securities, emerging markets debt, or high yield. For those categories, we will use a fund or ETF because it’s more important to diversify very broadly with lower credit quality.

Bonds for Safety in 2019

Posted On January 3, 2019 By Scott Stratton, CFP(R), CFA In Portfolio Management / 1 Comment

2018 saw rising interest rates, which hurt the prices of bonds. Most bond funds were flat to slightly down for the year. Rising interest rates also means higher yields, and we now see sufficient yields to justify buying short-term bonds. We have been reducing our equity exposure over the last few weeks, and have been using those proceeds to buy individual investment grade short-term bonds and Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs).

I wanted to share a couple of themes which will guide our investment process for fixed income in the year ahead. In general, this is not a great time to be taking a lot of risk with your bond allocation. We want to use bonds to offset the risk of stocks to dampen overall portfolio volatility. Thankfully, bonds can now also make a positive contribution to your return albeit in a very modest 2-4% range, and with low or very low risk.

1. Credit doesn’t pay. A credit spread measures the difference in yield between a high quality bond, such as a US Treasury bond, versus say a bond issued by a company which has lower credit. That spread remains very tight today, meaning that you are not getting much additional yield for accepting the credit risk of a lower quality issuer.

This has led us to be selective about which corporate bonds we buy, only buying issues which have enough spread to justify their purchase. In today’s market, this primarily leads us to financial companies, especially the large banks, and to municipal bonds, including the rarely-discussed taxable municipal bonds which are a good choice for IRAs or other non-taxable accounts.

Both Treasury and US Government Agency bonds still have lower yields than CDs. This month, we bought some one-year CDs at 2.70% to 2.75% while the one-year Treasury was around 2.50%. That spread widens as we look to two and three year maturities.

I should explain that we offer “Brokerage CDs”, which are a little different than your typical bank CDs. Brokerage CDs are FDIC-insured against loss and we can shop for the best rates available, from both top banks like Wells Fargo or JP Morgan Chase and from smaller local banks who want to compete for the best yield.

While you can typically redeem a bank CD early, albeit with an interest penalty of a few months, with a Brokerage CD, you would have to sell the CD in the bond market. If interest rates continue to rise, you would likely have to sell at less than full value. While these CDs offer the excellent rates, they are best used when you can hold to maturity.

We use CD rates as the basis of our spread comparison, rather than the traditional Treasury bonds. If we can’t find an improvement of at least 0.35% to 0.50% for an A-rated bond, then it’s not worth taking even the small risk over the CD. We will still use Treasury Bills for maturities of 6 months or less.

2. 5-year Ladder. In larger accounts, our goal is to create a ladder of bonds and CDs that mature over the following five years (2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023). This gives us a nice diversification of maturities while still maintaining a low overall duration. When the 2019 bonds mature, we purchase 2024 bonds to maintain a 5-year structure. In a rising rate environment, we are likely to be able buy new bonds at a higher rate.

Besides being a sensible way to build a bond portfolio, a ladder also can be used to meet future needs for withdrawals or Required Minimum Distributions. Then instead of needing to sell equities or bond funds which could be down, we have a bond that is maturing to meet those cash needs. As a result, an investor might not need to touch their equities for the next five years. If or when their equities do grow, we can rebalance by selling stocks and buying new bonds at the top of the ladder.

While bond prices may go down if interest rates continue to rise in 2019, when you have an individual bond or CD, you know that it will mature at its full face value. So even if prices fluctuate, you will realize your stated Yield to Maturity when you do hold to maturity, which should be very possible with a 5-year ladder.

(Two notes: 1. While we can say that CDs and Treasury Bonds are guaranteed, other types of bonds do have some risk of default and cannot be described as guaranteed. 2. Investors who try to predict interest rates have as little success as investors who try to predict stock markets. We do not want to make bets on the direction of interest rates.)

3. Fixed Annuities. Annuities get a bad rap, but a Fixed Annuity is a third type of guaranteed fixed income investment. They deserve a closer look by investors as a bond substitute and work well with a 5-year laddered approach.

The current rate for a 5-year fixed annuity is 3.80% from one carrier I use. That compares to a 5-year CD at 3.35% to 3.60%. That’s not much of an improvement, however, the Fixed Annuity is an insurance product outside of our managed portfolio, so there are no investment management fees. Your net return is 3.80%. The insurance company will pay me a small commission directly, which does not impact your principal or your rate of return.

I think laddering fixed annuities can make sense for some, as a bond replacement, and more investors should learn about this before dismissing it as soon as they hear the word annuity. A 3.80% percent return on an annuity would be the equivalent of a 4.80% bond if you include a 1% annual management fee.

We wrote about doing a 5-year ladder of Fixed Annuities back in February 2016 in this blog, and I think it still makes sense for some investors. We would count this as part of your fixed income target for your overall portfolio allocation (60/40, etc.).

The stock market gets a lot of attention, but we don’t neglect fixed income in our portfolios. I do think there are benefits to managing your bond portfolio, and we spend as much time sweating the details of our fixed income selections as we do our stock market exposures.

Why You Should Not Hold Bonds to Maturity

Posted On June 22, 2015 By Admin In Portfolio Management /

If you own individual bonds, as opposed to bond funds, you have the option to sell your bonds rather than holding them to maturity. There are a number of reasons why you might sell a bond before it matures, but we’re going to focus on an important opportunity bond investors have today to enhance returns through roll yield.

In recent years, short-term interest rates have been very low, which causes a steep yield curve. A corporate bond might have a yield to maturity of 3-5% when it has 5-10 years to maturity, but a similar bond with only one year before maturity may yield only 1-2%. Bond yields and prices have an inverse relationship, so as bonds near maturity, their yields shrink and the prices of those bonds increase.

Here’s an example: Let’s say we purchase a 5-year bond with a 5% coupon at par ($1000). One year later, the bond has four years remaining, and let’s say that similar bonds have a yield to maturity of 4%. The price of our 5% bond is now $1036. If we sell the bond after one year, we will have received $50 in interest, and we will made $36 in capital gains, for a total increase of $86, or 8.6%. The $36 gain is the roll yield, and it nicely enhanced our return from 5% to 8.6% for just one year.

When you buy most bonds, it’s not likely that the price of the bond will stay the same until maturity. Because of the steepness of today’s yield curve (low short-term rates), bond investors can benefit from selling bonds above par before maturity. If we go back to our example of a 5% coupon bond, let’s fast forward a couple of years to when the bond has just one year left to maturity. If the yield on 1-year bonds is 1.5%, our bond would be worth $1034. We could sell for $1034 today versus waiting a year to get back $1000. And while we’d miss out on the final $50 in interest payments, we could use our $1034 to buy other bonds further out on the yield curve. Also, given that the $34 gain would be treated as a capital gain (at a 15% tax rate for many investors), whereas the $50 bond interest would be treated as ordinary income (25%, 28%, 33%, 39.6% or higher), the after-tax return of selling a year early is almost the same as holding until maturity.

Generally, we advocate a laddered approach to individual bonds, but for the last several years, low interest rates have made it possible to sell bonds a couple of years before maturity to take advantage of roll yield. If your bonds are priced with a yield to maturity of 2% or less, it is definitely worth a look to see if you might benefit from selling rather than holding to maturity. This type of active management takes a bit of work, and frankly, we don’t see a lot of other advisors providing this level of service.

We typically suggest using bond funds for portfolios under $1 million dollars, because it is difficult to achieve a satisfactory level of diversification on smaller portfolios. The managers of your bond fund are likely looking closely at roll yield as well as other reasons to buy or sell bonds, to take advantage of the current interest rate environment. This is one of the reasons that it may be easier for fixed income managers to have a better chance of outperforming their benchmark than equity managers. While 65-80% of equity managers typically underperform their benchmark over five years, according to S&P, only 41.09% of intermediate investment grade bond funds were beaten by their benchmark from 2010 through 2014.

Equities tend to get all the attention, but many of our clients have 30 to 50 percent of their portfolio in fixed income. It’s important that investors do a good job selecting and managing both their equity and fixed income holdings. If you currently have a portfolio of individual bonds, bring me a statement for a complementary portfolio review. I’ll analyze your portfolio and suggest which bonds to keep and which ones to sell and replace. Or if you’re trying to decide between individual bonds or bond funds, please give me a call.