Financial Strategies for Low Rates

Posted On August 6, 2020 By Scott Stratton, CFP(R), CFA In Financial Planning /

Opportunities for a Low Yield World, Part 3

Today’s low rates are challenging for investors and may require changes not just to your investment portfolio, but also your overall financial strategies. In Part 1 of this series, we looked at the potential of rising defaults in high yield bonds and why it’s problematic to buy high yield bonds. Then in Part 2, we looked at four concrete ways to increase your yield today without radically changing your risk profile.

For Part 3, we looking at the broader ramifications of low interest rates on financial planning. My goal is always to explain and educate, but most importantly, to offer tangible solutions. Even in a crisis, there are opportunities.

But before we get into specific financial planning strategies, let’s consider two important points. First, low interest rates penalize savers. But low rates help borrowers. So, this is a great time to be a borrower, especially if you can lock in a low rate for 15, 20, or 30 years. Hopefully the current crisis will be short-lived, but borrowing at these low rates could be beneficial for decades to come.

Second, we should consider inflation. Bonds may be earning only 1%, but if inflation is zero, you would still have a real return of 1%. Your purchasing power is growing by 1%. Now, if bonds were yielding 6% and inflation was 5%, your real return would be the same, just 1%. While real returns are indeed quite low today, inflation is also below the historic average. So, your real returns aren’t as bad as they might appear.

Now, here are nine specific financial strategies to use today’s low rates to improve your situation.

Borrow for Appreciation

1) Refinance Mortgage. This is a great time to refinance your mortgage and lock in a low rate. Try to avoid lengthening the term of your loan and instead use low rates to pay off your mortgage sooner. If you can save 1% or more and plan to be in your home for several years, it will probably make sense to refi. I would be careful, however, of using low rates to buy the most expensive home possible. A home is largely an expense, rather than a great investment. Even better: use low rates to buy new investment properties. If you can borrow money to buy a business, investment property, or other appreciating asset, money is the cheapest it has ever been. Think long-term today!

2) Pay down debt. As long as you have a good emergency fund and a stable job, how much additional cash do you need? If you have student loans, a mortgage, car loans, or especially credit card debt, maybe it makes more sense to pay down your high-interest debt. Especially, debt that is not tied to an appreciating asset. Paying down 5% loans with cash earning 0% will save you interest costs.

Portfolio Adjustments

3) Reallocate away from bonds. With the 10-Year Treasury yielding under 1%, a lot of investment grade bonds and funds are going to have piddling returns over the next decade. Unless you really need to be defensive (maybe you are 5 years from retirement), having 40-50% earning 1% will likely be a drag on your portfolio. I have no idea what the stock market will do over the next 12-24 months. But, I do believe that a 90% equity allocation will probably outperform a 50% equity allocation over the next 30 years. Not everyone should take on more risk, but young people should invest for growth. The historical returns of a 60/40 portfolio are pretty much out the window with today’s low rates.

4) Alternative assets start to look more attractive when bonds are yielding 1%. Perhaps a 50% equity/30% alternative/20% bond portfolio could provide more return with less risk than a 60% equity/40% bond portfolio.

Retirement under Low Rates

5) Delay Social Security for 8% gains. When you delay your Social Security starting date, you can increase your monthly benefit by 8% a year (from age 66 to 70). Where else can you get a guaranteed 8% return today? No where. It may be better to spend down your bonds earning 1% from 62 or 66 until age 70 for the increase in SS benefits. The lower the rate of return from your portfolio, the more valuable the 8% Social Security increase becomes.

6) Take a pension, not a lump sum. If you have a pension from your employer, should you take the monthly payments or a lump sum? The answer will depend, in part, on your rate of return if you invest the lump sum option. Pension benefits have stayed up, but interest rates have moved down, which means that the pension is on the hook for very expensive benefits now. Companies are sweating this. But for a participant, it is tougher today to assume that you can do better by taking the lump sum. If your goal is lifetime income for you and your spouse, let’s run the numbers before making this decision. (We will also want to consider the credit quality of your Pension, its funded status, and your health and longevity profile.)

7) Immediate annuity. You can try to fund your retirement with bond income, but that’s more difficult with low interest rates. Immediate annuity payouts have not declined as much. So today, they are relatively attractive compared to bonds and eliminate the risk of outliving your money. With bonds, you have only two options under low rates: decrease the payout to yourself or start eating into your principal.

Estate Planning for Wealth Transfer

8) Trust Planning and intra-family loans. The Applicable Federal Rate and the 7520 rate are the lowest they have ever been. These low rates create opportunities for advanced financial strategies in estates and trusts. Intra-family loans: if you want to loan money to children or grandchildren for a mortgage, to buy your business, or to buy life insurance on your life, the interest rate required by the IRS is presently only 1.15%, for loans over 9 years.

9) Grantor Retained Annuity Trust. This is an irrevocable trust, which will shift assets outside of your lifetime gift and estate exemption. As the grantor, you receive income from the GRAT, and the remainder goes to your heirs (outside of your estate). The GRAT assumes the current 7520 rate of 0.80%, which is a low hurdle to beat. If your GRAT can do better than 0.80%, the heirs benefit.

Why do this Estate Planning now? The 2020 Estate Tax exemption of $11.58 million is set to sunset and revert to $5.49 million in 2026. If you are above these amounts, now is a great time to plan ahead. Placing assets into a GRAT now would remove their future growth from your estate. So, if you have assets which you think are undervalued today or which you expect will have significant growth going forward, removing them from your estate today could save tremendous future estate taxes for your heirs.

Low interest rates are problematic for savers and for bond holders, but also an opportunity for different financial strategies. Would some of these nine strategies enable you to benefit from low interest rates? I’m here to help you uncover ideas you haven’t considered, examine if they might be useful for you, and implement them effectively. Let’s take a look at your liabilities, your portfolio, your retirement income, and your estate goals and create a comprehensive plan for you.

The 12% Roth Conversion: Why It Still Matters in 2026

Posted On February 23, 2020 By Scott Stratton, CFP(R), CFA In Retirement Planning /

For baby boomers and pre-retirees with $500,000–$5 million in investable assets who want a fiduciary advisor and are comfortable working remotely.

A “12% Roth conversion” is a strategic approach to using the 12% federal income tax bracket to convert pre-tax retirement dollars into Roth IRA dollars without jumping into a higher marginal tax rate — potentially saving taxes over the long term. This concept is still relevant in 2026 for many retirement income strategies.

What Is a Roth Conversion?

A Roth conversion moves money from a Traditional IRA or other pre-tax plan into a Roth IRA, where future growth and qualified withdrawals are tax-free.
When you convert, the converted amount is added to your taxable income for the year and taxed at ordinary income tax rates. This requires careful planning so that the conversion stays within a tax bracket that minimizes the tax cost.

Roth conversions also reduce future required minimum distributions (RMDs), because Roth IRAs are not subject to RMDs during the owner’s lifetime.

Why the “12% Roth Conversion” Strategy Is Still Useful in 2026

The idea behind a 12% Roth conversion is to use the width of the 12% federal income tax bracket to convert pre-tax retirement assets without triggering a jump into the 22% bracket.
In 2026, the federal income tax system still has a 10%, 12%, 22%, 24%, 32%, 35% and 37% structure.

Planning your conversions to fill up the 12% bracket means you’re paying tax at a relatively low marginal rate while preserving room in higher brackets for other income like Social Security, pensions, or RMDs.

2026 Tax Brackets Matter

Because IRS inflation adjustments happen annually, the exact income range for the 12% bracket changes each year. In 2026, the 12% bracket remains a meaningful range that many pre-retirees can use efficiently before conversions push them into 22%.

The standard deduction for 2026 has also increased. For a married couple filing jointly in 2026, the 12% bracket goes all the way up to $100,800 in taxable income. With a standard deduction of $32,200, a couple can have gross income up to $133,000 and remain inside of the 12% tax bracket. So if your joint income is under $133,000, this is for you.

In this context, a Roth conversion strategy that fills up the 12% bracket can be especially useful when done in lower income years before RMDs begin. It may also be beneficial to defer starting Social Security for several years, if you are able to wait.

How a 12% Roth Conversion Actually Works in Practice

Step-by-Step Thinking

1) Estimate Your Taxable Income Without a Conversion
Consider all retirement income (Social Security, pensions, distributions, etc.) before conversions. Your goal is to identify how much room exists in the 12% bracket after accounting for the standard deduction.
AI tools and tax software can help model this.

2) Determine Conversion Amounts That Stay Within the 12% Bracket
Once you know your base income, you can calculate how much traditional IRA/401(k) assets to convert so that you end the year at the top of the 12% bracket, not above it. This means you’re paying tax at relatively low rates and not unnecessarily increasing future Medicare premiums or other surtaxes.

3) Evaluate Interaction With Other Credits and Surcharges
Conversion decisions can impact other parts of your tax situation — like Medicare IRMAA, Social Security taxation, and capital gains. An advisor can help you model these impacts comprehensively.

Because Roth conversions add to your income, you must be careful not to push yourself into a much higher marginal bracket, where the tax cost may outweigh the benefit of tax-free growth later.

Why 2026 Is Still a Strong Year to Consider This Strategy

1. Higher Standard Deduction and Bracket Thresholds Help You Stay in Lower Rates
The 2026 standard deduction and inflation-adjusted brackets give many retirees more room to convert without hitting higher marginal rates, making conversions that stay within the 12% bracket more accessible. It remains possible that a future administration will seek to raise income tax rates, given the massive deficits we are running now.

2. Roth In-Plan Conversions Are Now Available for TSP Accounts
Starting in 2026, federal employees and retirees can convert pre-tax TSP funds directly to the Roth TSP balance within the plan, offering another tool for strategic Roth planning.

3. Roth Conversions Still Bolster Long-Term Tax Planning
Converted assets grow tax-free forever, can reduce taxable required minimum distributions later, and provide more flexible withdrawal sequencing in retirement. Your beneficiaries, such as a spouse or children, also can receive your Roth IRA tax-free.

Who Benefits Most From a 12% Roth Conversion

This strategy is most useful for:

Retirees and pre-retirees who have room in the 12% or 22% tax brackets
Years where taxable income (without conversion) is relatively low
Individuals not subject to very high Medicare IRMAA surcharges
Anyone aiming to reduce future RMDs and lifetime tax drag

For baby boomers and pre-retirees with $500,000–$5M in investable assets, this can be a powerful planning tool — especially when conversions are integrated with Social Security timing, RMD planning, and total tax modeling.

When a 12% Roth Conversion May Not Make Sense

It may not be advantageous if:

Conversion would push you into the 22% bracket or higher
You lack cash outside retirement accounts to pay the tax
You are near Medicare IRMAA thresholds that would increase premiums
You are under 65 and receive a Premium Tax Credit through Obamacare
Your projected future tax rates are lower than current rates
You need the money within 5 years. Each Conversion is subject to a 5-year waiting rule.

Conversions also cannot be undone; once you pay the tax, the decision is permanent under current law.

Additional Roth Conversion Considerations

Conversion Rules Still Apply in 2026

You must report the conversion on IRS Form 8606.
Converted amounts are taxed as ordinary income in the year of conversion.

Pro-Rata Rule for Partial Conversions: If you have multiple IRA accounts, the IRS uses the pro-rata rule to determine taxable portions of conversions.

Roth Inside Employer Plans: Some employer plans (like 401(k)s or 403(b)s) allow in-plan or in-service Roth conversions, but rules vary by plan.

How We Approach 12% Roth Conversions

At Good Life Wealth Management, we evaluate Roth conversion strategies — including 12% conversions — as part of a holistic retirement plan.
That means we:

Coordinate with Social Security timing
Model Medicare IRMAA and surtax effects
Analyze RMD interactions
Consider your overall tax picture and goals

If you’re thinking about Roth conversions and want help optimizing them within your retirement income strategy, we work with clients nationwide through remote planning and are happy to help you evaluate your situation.

👉 You might also find our Questions to Ask a Financial Advisor helpful if you are comparing advisors or considering professional guidance.

This topic is often part of a broader retirement or tax planning conversation. If you’d like help applying these ideas to your own situation, you can request an introductory conversation here.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a 12% Roth conversion?
A 12% Roth conversion means converting just enough pre-tax retirement dollars into a Roth IRA so that the conversion income fits within the 12% tax bracket, avoiding higher marginal tax rates.

Can I do a Roth conversion inside my 401(k) or TSP?
Some plans allow in-plan Roth conversions, including new options for Roth TSP conversions starting in 2026, but plan rules vary — check with your administrator.

Is the 12% Roth Conversion Right for Everyone?
No, there are many individual circumstances to consider.. For example, if you plan to leave your IRA to charity, conversions are an unnecessary tax.

Can I also make Roth 401(k) Contributions?

Yes, if you are a participant in a 401(k) or 403(b) plan, you may have the option to make Roth contributions (after-tax). And if you still have room in your tax bracket, you can make a Roth conversion on a Traditional IRAs or 401(k) balances, too.

Related Retirement Income Topics
– Retirement Income Planning
– Guardrails Withdrawal Strategy
– Social Security: It Pays to Wait
– Required Minimum Distributions
– What Is a MYGA?

Social Security Planning: Marriage, Divorce, and Survivors

Posted On April 29, 2017 By Scott Stratton, CFP(R), CFA In Retirement Planning /

The Social Security Statement you receive is often incomplete if you are married, were married, or are a widow or widower. Your statement shows your own earnings history and a projection of your individual benefits, but never shows your eligible benefits as a spouse, ex-spouse, or survivor.

In general, when someone is eligible for more than one type of Social Security benefit, they will receive the larger benefit, not both. But how are you supposed to know if the spousal benefit is the larger option? Social Security is helpful with applying for benefits, but they don’t exactly go out of their way to let you know in advance about what benefits you might receive or when you should file for these benefits.

The rules for claiming spousal benefits, divorced spouse benefits, and survivor benefits are poorly understood by the public. And unfortunately, many financial advisors don’t understand these rules either, even though Social Security is the cornerstone of retirement planning for most Americans. Today we are giving you the basics of what you need to know. With this information, you may want to delay or accelerate benefits. The timing of when you take Social Security is a big decision, one which has a major impact on the total lifetime benefits you will receive.

1) Spousal Benefits. If you are married, you are eligible for a benefit based on your spouse’s earnings, once your spouse has filed to receive those benefits. If you are at Full Retirement Age (FRA) of 66 or 67, your spousal benefit is equal to 50% of your spouse’s Primary Insurance Amount (PIA). If you start benefits before your FRA, the benefit is reduced. You could start as early as age 62, which would provide a benefit of 32.5% of your spouse’s PIA. Calculate your benefit reduction here.

If your own benefit is already more than 50% of your spouse’s benefit, you would not receive an additional the spousal benefit. When you file for Social Security benefits, the administration will automatically calculate your eligibility for a spousal benefit and pay you whichever amount is higher. A quick check is to compare both spouse’s Social Security statements; if one of your benefits is more than double the other person’s benefit, you are a potential candidate for spousal benefits.

If your spouse is receiving benefits and you have a qualifying child under age 16 or who receives Social Security disability benefits, your spousal benefit is not reduced from the 50% level regardless of age.

Please note that spousal benefits are based on PIA and do not receive increases for Deferred Retirement Credits (DRCs), which occur after FRA until age 70. While the higher-earning spouse will receive DRCs for delaying his or her benefits past FRA, the spousal benefit does not increase. Furthermore, the spousal benefit does not increase after the spouse’s FRA; it is never more than one-half of the PIA. If you are going to receive a spousal benefit, do not wait past your age 66, doing so will not increase your benefit!

2) Divorced Spouse Benefits. If you were married for at least 10 years, you are eligible for a spousal benefit based on your ex-spouse’s earnings. You are eligible for this benefit if you are age 62 or older, unmarried, and your own benefit is less than the spousal benefit. A lot of divorced women, who may have spent years out of the workforce raising a family, are unaware of this benefit.

Unlike regular spousal benefits, your ex-spouse does not have to start receiving Social Security benefits for you to be eligible for a benefit as an ex-spouse, as long as you have been divorced for at least two years.The ex-spouse benefit has no impact on the former spouse or on their subsequent spouses. See Social Security: If You Are Divorced.

If you remarry, you are no longer eligible for a benefit from your first marriage, unless your second marriage also ends by divorce, death, or annulment.

A couple of hypothetical scenarios, below. Please note that the gender in these examples is irrelevant. It could be reversed. The same rules also apply for same-sex marriages now.

a) A man is married four times. The first marriage lasted 11 years, the second lasted 10 years, the third lasted 8 years, and his current (fourth) marriage started three years ago. The current spouse is eligible for a spousal benefit. The first two spouses are eligible for an ex-spouse benefit, but the third is not because that marriage lasted less than 10 years. A person can have multiple ex-spouses, and all marriages which lasted 10+ years qualify for an ex-spouse benefit!

b) A woman was married for 27 years to a high-wage earner, and they divorced years ago. She did not work outside of the home and does not have an earnings record to qualify for her own benefit. She is 66 and unmarried, so she would qualify for a benefit based on her ex-spouse’s record.

However, if she were to marry her current partner, she would no longer be eligible for her ex-spousal benefits. If the new spouse was not receiving benefits, she could not claim spousal benefits until he or she filed for benefits. Additionally, if the new partner is not a high wage earner, her “old” benefit based on the ex-spouse may be higher! Some retirees today are actually not remarrying because of the complexity it adds to their retirement and estate planning. And in some cases, there is an actual reduction in benefits by remarrying.

3) Survivor Benefits. If a spouse has already started their Social Security benefits and then passes away, the surviving spouse may continue to receive that amount or their own, whichever is higher. The survivor’s benefit can never be more than what they would receive if the spouse was still alive.

If the deceased spouse had not yet started benefits, the widow or widower can start survivor benefits as early as age 60, but this amount is reduced based on their age (See Chart). Widows or widowers who remarry after they reach age 60 do not have their survivorship eligibility withdrawn or reduced.

One way to look at the survivorship benefit: which ever spouse has the higher earnings history, that benefit will apply for both spouse’s lifetimes. The higher benefit is essentially a joint benefit. For this reason, it may make sense for the higher earner to delay until age 70 to maximize their benefit. If their spouse is younger, is in terrific health, and has a family history of substantial longevity, it may be profitable to think of the benefit in terms of joint lifetimes.

Additionally, Social Security offers a one-time $255 death benefit and also has benefits for survivors who are disabled or have children under age 16 or who are disabled.

The challenge for planning is that none of these three benefits – spousal, ex-spouse, or survivor – are indicated on your Social Security statement. So it is very easy to make a mistake and not apply for a benefit. I like for my clients to send me a copy of their Social Security statements, and I have to say that more than half of the clients I have met don’t understand how these benefits work, even if they are aware that they are eligible.

Social Security Administration: it’s time to fix your statements. You can do better.

How to Maximize Your Social Security

Posted On July 14, 2014 By Admin In Retirement Planning /

When should I start my Social Security benefits? I am asked this question frequently and find that many otherwise rational individuals don’t actually look at any data or analysis when making this important decision. As a financial planner, I have the tools to help you take a closer look at all your options to make an informed choice, rather than relying on heuristic biases. The first step, though, is to understand what happens when you start at age 62, 66, or 70. And that’s what today’s post aims to accomplish.

74% of Americans start their Social Security benefits early, before the Full Retirement Age (FRA) of 66 (for individuals born between 1943-1954). Starting at age 62 will result in a reduction in benefits to 75% of your primary insurance amount (PIA). If you wait past age 66, you will receive Delayed Retirement Credits (DRCs), equal to 8% a year, or a 32% increase for individuals who wait until age 70. Many of the individuals who wait until age 70 do so because they are still working. However, even for individuals who retire at age 62, it may make sense to delay benefits to age 66 or 70 and live off other sources of income, in order to receive a higher future Social Security benefit.

Delaying from age 62 to 70 offers a 76% increase in benefits. For example, someone with a PIA of $1000 a month would receive this amount at age 66, but would receive $750 at 62 or $1320 at 70. While COLAs or additional earnings will increase your benefits regardless of when you start, a 2% COLA is obviously going to produce a higher dollar increase if your benefit amount is $1320 rather than $750. So in nominal dollars, the difference between 62 and 70 typically exceeds 76%.

For single individuals, the decision is relatively straightforward. Social Security was designed so that a person with average life expectancy will receive the same benefits regardless of whether they start at age 62, 66, or 70. On an individual level, if your life expectancy is above average, you will receive greater total lifetime payments by delaying benefits until age 70. And if your life expectancy is below average, you will not have enough years of higher benefits to make up for the lost years, so you should start benefits earlier. The breakeven for delaying from age 66 to age 70 is between age 83 and 84. Delaying from 62 to 70 creates a breakeven between age 80 and 81.

Since 74% of recipients start benefits early, the behavioral bias is that people are underestimating their life expectancy. It should be 50% – half of us will live shorter than average and half will live longer. Unfortunately, many of the 74% will live longer than average and their choice means they will receive lower lifetime benefits than if they had delayed to age 66 or 70.

In addition to life expectancy, the other consideration for a single individual is if they have other sources of income. If he or she can get by with withdrawals of 4% or less from their portfolio from age 62 or 66 to age 70, then I would encourage them to delay the Social Security benefits.

Delaying benefits will reduce the future withdrawals required from their portfolio and increase the likelihood that their portfolio will be able to provide lifetime income. When I run Monte Carlo analyses for clients, those who fund a larger percentage of their needs from guaranteed payments like Social Security (or a Pension) have a greater probability of success than retirees who are more dependent on portfolio withdrawals. A larger Social Security benefit reduces the impact from poor potential outcomes in the stock and bond markets, or from an initial drop in the market, called Sequence of Returns Risk.

For married couples, the decision to delay benefits becomes more complex. Neither your Social Security statements nor the calculators on the SSA.gov website help with coordinating spousal benefits. Often, it may make sense to delay for one spouse but not for the other.

A general rule for couples is that you should consider maximizing the higher earning spouse’s SS benefit amount by delaying to age 70. The larger benefit will become the survivor’s benefit, so in effect, the higher earner can consider his or her benefit to be a joint and survivor benefit. And if the spouse is younger or has a high life expectancy, than delaying to age 70 for the higher earner may be an even better idea, in terms of actuarial odds.

Social Security is a good hedge for portfolio performance and an 8% guaranteed increase for delaying one year is a valuable benefit. I looked at quotes this month for immediate single-life annuities and for a 66-yr old male versus a 67-yr old, the rate increase was only 2.2%. Delaying from 66 to age 70 increased the annuity benefit by 12.2%. That gives you an idea of how exceptionally valuable the 8% annual increase is (or 32% for waiting four years), given the low interest rate environment we face today.

Aside from the principle of delaying the higher earning spouse, it is difficult to make other generalizations about delaying to age 70 as the details of a couple’s specific situation typically determine the best course of action. I use financial planning software to analyze your options and suggest an approach to coordinate your benefits into your overall financial plan. There are two tools which married couples might consider to provide some often-missed benefits as one or both defer to age 70.

The first tool is the ability to file and suspend. At full retirement age (66), you can file for benefits but immediately suspend the payments. This enables your spouse to be eligible to receive a spousal benefit, while you can continue to receive deferred credits for delaying to age 70. This is typically used if the spouse does not have any SS benefit based on their own earnings, or if the spouse’s individual benefit is less than the spousal benefit amount (half of the first spouse’s PIA, if the second spouse is at FRA).

If a spousal benefit applies, it is important to know that DRCs are not added to a spousal benefit. While the primary spouse will receive the 8% increase after age 66, the spousal benefit does not increase. So, if the spouse is the same age or older than the higher earning spouse, it is important to not delay the spousal benefit once both are age 66.

The second tool is a restricted application. At FRA, a spouse may restrict their application to receive only their spousal benefit amount and still earn Deferred Retirement Credits on their own benefit. Then they can switch to their own benefit at age 70. However, to receive any spousal benefit, the other spouse must be currently receiving benefits. This works if you want to delay from age 66 to 70 and if your spouse is already receiving benefits (or has filed and suspended).

These two tools provide a benefit from age 66-70 which many people miss. Both techniques will allow one spouse to defer their individual benefit to age 70 to maximize their payment amount (and potentially, the survivor’s benefit amount), while receiving an additional benefit for those four years. If you might benefit from either of those tools, don’t expect the Social Security Administration to tell you. And if you miss those benefits, you’ll lose free money that you can’t get later.

Information

Request an Introductory Conversation