Extra Catch-Up for 2025

Extra Catch-Up Contributions for 2026

Summary: For 2026, the IRS increased retirement plan and catch-up contribution limits for participants age 50 and over. There are now age-based catch-up tiers and income-based Roth catch-up requirements under SECURE 2.0. Understanding these updates helps in planning retirement contributions and tax-efficient saving.


How Catch-Up Contributions Work

Age-50+ catch-up contributions allow individuals age 50 or older by year-end to contribute above standard deferral limits in qualified retirement plans (401(k), 403(b), and some 457 plans) and IRAs. These extra contributions are designed to help older workers increase savings as retirement approaches.


2026 Contribution Limits

For tax year 2026, the IRS has updated limits and catch-up amounts as follows:

Employer-Sponsored Plans (401(k), 403(b), 457(b))

  • Standard deferral limit: $24,500
  • Age 50+ base catch-up: $8,000
  • Enhanced catch-up (ages 60-63): $11,250
    Total maximum when eligible: up to $35,750.

IRA Catch-Up Contributions

  • IRA contribution limit: $7,500
  • IRA age 50+ catch-up: $1,100
    Total IRA possible for age 50+: $8,600.

SIMPLE IRA Plans

  • Standard limit: $17,000
  • Age 50+ catch-up: $4,000
  • Enhanced (ages 60-63): $5,250 (for eligible plans)

New Roth Catch-Up Requirement in 2026

Under the SECURE 2.0 Act, beginning in 2026, higher-earning participants age 50+ must designate catch-up contributions as Roth (after-tax) once they exceed the regular deferral limit if their prior-year wages exceed a threshold (indexed; ~$150,000 for 2025 wages affecting 2026). This means such catch-up amounts are subject to taxation when contributed, not when withdrawn.

Why it matters: Some employers may require Roth catch-up contributions if plan design allows. If the plan does not support Roth contributions, some participants may not be able to take advantage of catch-up features.


Age-Based Catch-Up: Why It Matters

The IRS continues to recognize that workers closer to retirement often have a stronger need (and ability) to save more:

  • Age 50+ base catch-up: a general bump to allow additional contributions.
  • Age 60-63 enhanced catch-up: for those in their early 60s, acknowledging a shorter time horizon to retirement.

These age-based tiers remain even with the Roth designation rule for eligible higher earners.


Planning Considerations for Retirees

Tax Treatment

Traditional catch-up contributions have historically been pre-tax, lowering taxable income today. In contrast, Roth catch-up contributions are made after tax, meaning they wonโ€™t lower current taxable income but may grow tax-free in retirement if distribution rules are met.

Job and Wage Tracking

The ROTH-designation requirement is based on prior-year wages for the same employer. Changing jobs or varying wage sources may affect eligibility for pre- vs. after-tax catch-up contributions.

Interaction With Retirement Timing

Boosted catch-up limits can be useful for:


Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Do catch-up contributions count toward the annual limit?
Catch-up contributions are in addition to the regular elective deferral limit โ€” they do not reduce the base deferral maximum.

Q: When do I qualify for catch-up contributions?
You qualify if you are age 50 or older by December 31 of the tax year. For enhanced catch-up, you must be ages 60-63 in that year.

Q: Will catch-up contributions affect my RMDs?
No โ€” catch-up contributions impact saving limits but do not directly change Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs) or their timing. For discussion of RMD timing, see RMDs & Timing.

Q: Do SIMPLE IRA catch-ups work differently?
Yes โ€” SIMPLE IRAs have their own catch-up rules and limits. They follow similar age-based tiers but different numeric caps.


Related Reading


Catch-up contributions can meaningfully affect your long-term retirement savings strategy, especially when combined with tax and income planning decisions. If youโ€™d like a planning-first discussion of how the 2026 catch-up limits might fit into your personal retirement picture, youโ€™re welcome to Request an Introductory Conversation.

To Roth or Not to Roth?

The question of “Roth or Traditional” has become even more complicated today with the advent of the Roth 401(k). Which should you choose for your 401(k)? Like many financial questions, the answer is “it depends”.

In asking the same question for an IRA, investors often look at their eligibility for the Roth versus their ability to deduct the Traditional IRA contribution. For the 401(k), that’s not an issue – there are no income restrictions or eligibility rules for a Traditional 401(k) or a Roth 401(k). You should also know that while you may choose Roth or Traditional contributions, any company match will always go in the Traditional bucket.

How to choose, then? Here are five considerations to making the decision:

1) If you are going to be in a lower tax bracket in retirement, it’s preferable to defer taxes today and pay taxes later. If this describes your situation, then you are likely better off in the Traditional 401(k). A majority of people should have an expectation of lower taxes in retirement.

2) The problem is that we don’t know what future tax rates will be. We do know that we are running massive budget deficits and that the accumulated national debt is a growing problem. While every politician wants to promise lower taxes to get votes, that seems unrealistic as a long-term solution to our budget issues. Retirees are often surprised that their taxes do not in fact vanish in retirement. Pension, Social Security, RMDs, etc. are all taxable income.

Link: Taxes and Retirement

If you believe you will be in the same or higher tax bracket in Retirement, then the advantage goes to the Roth. While you will not realize a tax benefit today from a Roth contribution, your money will grow tax-free. If you are going to pay the same tax rates in the future as today, you would be indifferent, in theory. Except that…

3) When you reach retirement, a $1 million Roth gives you $1 million to spend, whereas $1 million in a Traditional IRA or 401(k) may be worth only $750,000, $600,000, or less after you take out Federal and State income taxes. This means saving $18,000 in a Roth 401(k) is worth more than the same $18,000 in a Traditional 401(k), because the Roth money will be available tax-free.

If you are in a lower tax bracket or can comfortably pay the taxes, then the Roth may be preferable. In retirement, if you have both Roth and Traditional accounts, you can choose where to take withdrawals to best manage your taxes. (We call this tax diversification.)

4) The only caveat to the Roth contribution is that contributing to a Traditional 401(k) can lower your Adjusted Gross Income (AGI). If having a lower AGI would make you eligible for a tax credit, or eligible for an IRA contribution, then it may be beneficial to choose the deductible contribution.

For example: The Saver’s Tax Credit

5) There are no Required Minimum Distributions from a Roth account. If you are in the fortunate position to have plenty of retirement assets, making Roth contributions will add to tax-free assets, rather than creating an RMD liability for when you turn 70 1/2.

Last thought: for the past two decades, I have met people who don’t want to invest in a Roth because they think the government will take away the tax-free benefit in the future. I don’t see this happening. The government actually prefers Roths because it increases current tax revenue rather than the Traditional, which decreases current taxes. And I don’t see Roth accounts being used or abused by Billionaires or corporations – the amounts are so small and used mainly by working families.