Are Your Tax-Deductions Going Away?

Last week, we discussed the current tax reform proposal in Washington and discussed how it would reduce incentives for homeowners two ways: by increasing the standard deduction and by eliminating the deduction for state and local taxes, including the deduction for property taxes. Recall that itemized deductions only are a benefit if they exceed the amount of the standard deduction, currently $6,350 single or $12,700 married.

While the legislation has yet to be finalized, it appears increasingly likely that we are on the eve of the most significant tax changes in 30 years. The proposals are slated to take effect in 2018, which means that if they are approved, there is still several weeks in 2017 to make use of the old rules.

For many Americans, your taxes will be lower under the current proposal. The biggest tax cuts, however, would go to corporations, with a proposed reduction from 35% to a maximum of 20%. That’s the proposal, but the final version may be different. The advice below is based on the current GOP plan; we would not advocate taking any steps until the reforms are in their final version and passed.

1. Itemized Deductions. The proposal would increase the standard deduction from $6,350 (single) and $12,700 (married) to $12,000 and $24,000. As a result, it is believed that instead of 33%, the number of taxpayers who itemize will fall to only 10%. If you have itemized deductions below $12,000/$24,000, you will no longer receive any benefit from those expenses in 2018.

  • Consider accelerating any tax deductions into 2017, such as property taxes, charitable donations, or unreimbursed employee expenses.
  • Itemized deductions for casualty losses, gambling losses/expenses, and medical expenses will be repealed.
  • Many miscellaneous deductions will disappear, including: tax preparation fees, moving for work (over 50 miles), and unreimbursed employee expenses.
  • Investment advisory fees, such as those I charge to clients, will still be tax deductible. However, these miscellaneous deductions only count when they exceed 2% of AGI, which will be more difficult to achieve with so many other deductions disappearing.
  • The $7,500 tax credit for the purchase of a plug-in electric vehicle will be abolished. If you were thinking of buying a Chevy Bolt or Nissan Leaf, better do so now! If you are on the wait list for a Tesla Model 3, you probably will not receive one before the credit disappears. Read more: “Is Your Car Eligible for a $7,500 Tax Credit?”

2. Real Estate. The Senate version we discussed last week had completely eliminated the deduction for property taxes and state/local taxed paid. Luckily, this has been softened to a cap of $10,000 for property taxes.

  • If your property taxes exceed $10,000, you might want to pay those taxes in December as part of your 2017 tax year. If you pay in January 2018, you would not receive the full deduction.
  • The proposal also caps the mortgage interest deduction to $500,000, and for your primary residence only. This is a substantial reduction. Currently, you can deduct interest on a mortgage up to $1 million, and you can also deduct mortgage interest on a second home, including, in some cases, an RV or yacht.
  • Many owners of second homes will likely try to treat these as investment properties, if they are willing to rent them out. As a rental, you can deduct taxes and other costs as a business expense. See my article: “Can You Afford a Second Home?”

3. Tax Brackets. The proposal reduces the tax brackets to four levels: 12%, 25%, 35%, and 39.6% (the current top bracket remains). These brackets are shifted to slightly higher income levels, so many taxpayers will be in a lower bracket than today or pay less tax. Those in the top bracket, 39.6%, who also make over $1 million, will have their income in the 12% range boosted to the 39.6% level. So don’t think this proposal is excessively generous to high earners – many will see higher taxes.

The Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) will be abolished, so if you have any Minimum Tax Credit carryforwards, those credits will be released. The 3.8% Medicare Surtax will unfortunately remain in place, even though Trump has previously promised to repeal it. Capital Gains rates will remain at 0%, 15%, and 20% depending on your tax bracket, and curiously, these rates will be tied to the old income levels, and not to the new tax brackets.

If passed, the tax reform bill will substantially change how we deduct expenses from our taxes. Those with simple returns may find that their tax bill is lower, but for many investors with more complicated tax situations, the proposed changes may require that you rethink how you approach your taxes.

We will keep you posted of how this unfolds and will especially be looking for potential ways it may impact our financial plans. It has often been said that the definition of a “loophole” is a tax benefit that someone else gets. Unfortunately, simplifying the tax code and closing these deductions is bound to upset many people who will see their favorite tax benefits reduced or removed entirely.

Home Tax Deductions: Overrated and Getting Worse

If you ask virtually anyone about the benefits of home ownership, you will probably hear the phrase “great tax deductions” within 20 seconds. However, the reality is that for many taxpayers, owning real estate is not much of a tax deduction at all. And under the Trump-proposed tax reform bill currently in Congress, the actual tax benefits homeowners achieve will shrink vastly.

The two main tax benefits of being a homeowner are the mortgage interest deduction and the property tax deduction. These are claimed under “itemized deductions”, which also include charitable donations, medical expenses (exceeding 7.5% or 10% of income), and miscellaneous deductions such as unreimbursed employee expenses.

You have your choice of taking whichever is higher: the standard deduction or your itemized deductions (Schedule A). The standard deduction for 2017 is $6,350 (single) or $12,700 (married filing jointly). So, the first thing to realize about home tax deductions is that you only are getting a benefit if they exceed $6,350/$12,700.

If you are married and your mortgage interest, property tax, and other deductions only total $11,000, you will take the standard deduction. All those house expenses did not get you a penny of additional tax benefits. If your itemized deductions total $13,000, you would take the itemized deductions, but are only getting a benefit of $300 – the amount by which you exceeded the standard deduction.

The greatest proportion of tax benefits for homeowners go to those with very expensive homes and large mortgages. People with more modest homes may be getting little or no benefit relative to the standard deduction. But wealthy taxpayers can have their itemized deductions reduced by up to 80% under the Pease Restrictions. So, I have also seen high earning families who don’t get to count their home expenses either, and have to take the Standard Deduction!

The proposal in Congress today via President Trump would make two significant changes to tax deductions for homeowners:

1. The bill would almost double the standard deduction from $6,350 (single) and $12,700 (married) today to $12,000 and $24,000. This would reduce taxes and eliminate the need for itemized deductions for many American families. If you are married and your current itemized deductions are under $24,000, you would no longer be getting a deduction for those expenses.

2. Trump also proposes eliminating the deduction for State and Local Taxes (the so-called SALT deductions), which includes property taxes. Removing the SALT deduction from Schedule A would be devastating for high tax states like California, New York, Connecticut, and New Jersey. But it would also harm many homeowners right here in Texas, where our property taxes can be a significant expense.

While the increase in the standard deduction would offset the loss of SALT deductions for many Americans, it is still an elimination of a key benefit of being a homeowner. The current tax reform bill has narrowly passed in the House of Representatives and will be taken up by the Senate after November 6, where it requires only a simple majority to pass under budget reconciliation rules.

The fact is that real estate tax deductions were already overstated when you recognize that you only benefit when you exceed the Standard Deduction. The first $12,700 in itemized deductions achieve no reduction in taxes whatsoever. Now, if Congress acts to increase the Standard Deduction and to eliminate the ability to deduct property taxes, most people will not be getting any tax break from being a homeowner.

Depending on your situation, your overall tax bill may still go down. The current proposal will simplify the tax brackets to just three levels: 12%, 25%, and 35%. Your taxes may also go down because of the increase in the Standard Deduction, provided the Standard Deduction is higher than your Schedule A.

Tax policy has a profound influence on public behavior. If you know that you are not getting any additional tax benefit from being a homeowner, you may prefer to rent. If you are retired and see your income taxes go up, you may decide to sell your home and downsize to save money. This change in policy may have the unintended consequence of hurting home values, too, because it certainly make being a homeowner less appealing.

Tracking Your Home Improvements

When you eventually sell your home, it may be helpful to have a record of your home improvement expenses. Because people often own their homes for decades, this is an area where a lot of records and receipts are lost. Here is what you need to know.

At the time of a home sale, the difference between your purchase price and your sale price is a taxable capital gain. Luckily for most people, there is a significant capital gains exclusion from the IRS: $250,000 (single) or $500,000 (married), for your primary residence. If your gain falls below this amount, you will not owe any taxes. In order to qualify, the property must have been your primary residence for at least two of the previous five years, and you must not have taken this exclusion for another property for two years.

If you make a capital improvement (described below), that expense increases your cost basis in the home. But because of the large exclusion ($250,000 or $500,000), many people don’t even bother to keep track of their home improvement expenses. That may be a mistake. Here are a number of scenarios which could be a problem:

  • If you get divorced or your spouse passes away, your exclusion will decrease from $500,000 to $250,000.
  • If you make another property your primary residence for four years, you will lose the tax exclusion on the previous property.
  • If you own your property for the next 30 years, it is possible your capital gain ends up being higher than the $250/$500k limits. These amounts are not indexed for inflation.
  • Congress could reduce this tax break, although it would be very unpopular to do so. They are not likely to change the definition of cost basis and capital gains.

What constitutes a Capital Improvement which would increase your cost basis? In general, the improvement must be permanent (lasting more than one year), attached to the property (not removable or decorative), and add to the value, use, or function of the property. Maintenance and repairs are generally not capital improvements unless they prolong your home’s useful life. The IRS provides the following specific examples of expenses that are Capital Improvements:

  • Additions, such as a new bathroom, bedroom, deck, garage, porch, or patio.
  • Permanent outdoor improvements, including paved driveways, fences, retaining walls, landscaping, or a swimming pool.
  • Exterior features, such as new windows, doors, siding, or a roof.
  • Insulation for your attic, walls, floors, or plumbing.
  • Home systems, including heat/central air, wiring, sprinkler, or alarm systems.
  • Plumbing upgrades such as septic systems, hot water heaters, filtration systems, etc.
  • Interior improvements, including built-in appliances, flooring, carpet, kitchen remodeling, or a new fireplace.

While there are many expenses which count as improvements, repairs and upkeep do not. Painting, replacing broken fixtures, patching a roof, or fixing plumbing leaks are not improvements. Also, if you install something and later remove it, that expense may not be counted. For example, if you install new carpet and then later replace the carpet with wood floors, you cannot include the carpet expense in your cost basis.

For full information on calculating your gain or loss on a home, see IRS Publication 523. While most homeowners are focused on mitigating taxable gains, I should add that if your capital improvements are significant enough to make your home sale into a loss, that loss would be a valuable tax benefit as it could offset other income. Here’s an example:

Purchase Price: $240,000
Capital Improvements: $37,400
Cost Basis: $277,400

Sale Price: $279,000
Minus 6% Realtor Commission: -$16,740
Closing Costs: -$1,250
Net Proceeds: $261,010

LOSS = $16,390

If you just looked at your purchase price and sales price, you might think that you would have a small gain (under the exclusion amount), and there was no need to keep track of your improvements. However, in this example, you do indeed end up with a loss, which would be valuable to your taxes. As a reminder: capital losses can offset any capital gains. Additionally, you can use $3,000 a year of losses to offset ordinary income. Unused capital losses carry forward into future years indefinitely, until they are used up.

Unlike other receipts, which you only need to keep for seven years, you do need to keep records of your capital improvements for as long as you own the home, and then seven years after you file your tax return after the sale. Even if you think you are going to be under the $500,000 tax exclusion, I’d highly recommend you keep track of these capital improvements which increase your cost basis.

Will Trump Lower Your Taxes?

Since the surprise victory of Donald Trump, the markets have rallied and the dollar has strengthened. This is in expectation of increased infrastructure spending, looser regulation of finance, healthcare, and other industries, and lower tax rates. What does this mean for your personal tax situation?

You can read Trump’s tax platform on his website here. He proposes to simplify individual taxes from seven brackets today to three: 12%, 25%, and 33%. For higher income taxpayers, this would be a reduction from 35% and 39.6%. He also proposes to eliminate the 3.8% Medicare Surtax on Investment Income (for taxpayers above $200,000 single and $250,000, married). And he wants to lower the corporate income tax rate from 35% to 15% to prevent companies from leaving the US and to encourage US corporations to repatriate profits from overseas subsidiaries.

Before we consider what planning strategies this suggests, I’d like to make two points.

1) What candidates propose during the campaign and what they can actually achieve are often very different. There’s no guarantee these plans will become law. In Trump’s favor, however, he has a Republican controlled House and Senate which should work with him. Under budget reconciliation rules, the Senate can pass tax changes with a simple majority, and need not have 60 votes.

2) Under Trump’s economic plan, the deficit will soar and the national debt will grow at an unprecedented rate. Not only is he kicking the can down the road by not addressing the deficit, he will massively increase our debt load. Eventually, the cost of our debt service will crowd out other spending and has the potential to become a significant problem for our children and grandchildren.

For individual taxpayers, Trump wants to increase the standard deduction to $15,000 single and $30,000 joint, but to cap itemized deductions to $100,000 single and $200,000 joint. While he would reduce taxes for many taxpayers, the largest savings will go to those in the top tax brackets who would pay 33% on income over $225,000 (joint), under the Trump plan.

If you are in the top tax bracket and believe that Trump’s plan will become a reality in 2017, you would see your marginal rate decrease from 43.4% (39.6% plus 3.8% Medicare) to 33% next year. In that scenario, you would want to defer receipt of income, as possible, from 2016 to 2017. And you would want to accelerate any tax deductions, business expenses, and short-term capital loss harvesting to take those reductions in 2016. For example, in December, you could pay your property taxes, make charitable gifts planned for 2017, and make purchases of office supplies or other business goods which can be expensed and not capitalized.

If you own a business, under Trump’s plan, it may become appealing to convert to a C-Corporation to take advantage of the 15% corporate tax rate, instead of remaining a sole proprietor or other pass-through tax structure. While a dollar of income would be taxed at the corporate level and again when passed through to the owner, the owner of a C-corporation has the opportunity to take a modest salary and receive the rest of the profits as a dividend, which would be taxed at 15-20%, and not require any payroll tax.

For current owners of a C-Corporation, you would want to reduce your 2016 income as much as possible if you anticipate a 20% tax reduction in 2017. This means deferring income until January (which involves different strategies depending whether you use the cash or accrual accounting method), and maximizing your 2016 deductions.

Last December, Congress made the Section 179 deduction permanent. As a business owner, you should know about Section 179, which allows you to immediately deduct qualifying business equipment purchases, rather than capitalizing the costs over the life of the equipment and taking an annual depreciation amount. The limit on Section 179 is $500,000 per year, and is phased out for businesses who have purchased more than $2 million in qualifying property.

Qualifying property eligible for the Section 179 deduction includes equipment/machines, computers, software, furniture, and business vehicles over 6,000 pounds GVWR (Gross Vehicle Weight Rating). The vehicle deduction is very popular with business owners, and may be applied for new or used vehicles. Please note that vehicles under 6,000 pounds GVWR do not qualify, and that for certain vehicles, the deduction may be capped to $25,000.

If you are expecting your corporate tax rate to fall in 2017, I’d look to maximize your Section 179 purchases in 2016 and make those purchases before the year’s end.

I’d prefer you keep your hard-earned money rather than give it to the government to spend, and I will suggest every legal opportunity to reduce the amount my clients pay to the IRS. Having said that, it seems unfair to ask future generations to pay for our profligate spending. Hopefully, our politicians will eventually think further out than just winning the next election, but I’m not going to hold my breath for that one.

Trump’s economic plan also means that inflation should start to pick up. We’ve already seen interest rates move up since the election, perhaps more than they should have, in expectation of Trump’s spending plans. Mortgage rates have started to rise, and I believe that real estate price increases will slow. Property reflation may be in the 8th or 9th inning in many parts of the country. Affordability is an issue in many cities, and higher mortgage rates will not support home prices continuing to increase by 5-7% or more per year.

No one knows what will unfold over the next four years under Trump but if tax rates decline, we will certainly welcome the savings. We will continue to look for ways to reduce taxes from your investment portfolio and be as tax efficient as possible.

How to Invest if Income Taxes Increase

Is there really any doubt that income taxes will be going up at some point in the future? Deficits are growing ($590 Billion for 2016 alone) and there is no interest in Washington in reducing expenditures. Given the magnitude of Federal spending, even if a balanced budget were possible, the reduction in cash flow would crush the economy and send unemployment through the roof. We’re addicted to our spending.

Politicians have realized that even the faintest hint of “raising taxes” would be career suicide. This means that increasing marginal tax rates (except on those making over $250,000) is impossible. But raising tax revenue by “closing loopholes for the rich” is considered a heroic undertaking. There are a lot of proposals out there right now to increase tax revenue, and you don’t have to be Bill Gates or Warren Buffet to be impacted.

Many of these “loopholes for the rich” benefit middle class professionals. Chances are that if you are reading this, you’re going to be paying higher taxes in the years ahead. Even if your marginal tax bracket remains the same, your effective tax rate – the total amount of taxes you pay – could rise with these proposals:

  • Eliminate the Stretch IRA for beneficiaries who inherit an IRA.
  • Close the Roth conversion process which allows the “back-door Roth IRA”.
  • Create Required Minimum Distributions for Roth IRAs.
  • Cut the estate tax exemption from $5.45 million to $3.5 million and increase the rate from 40% to a range of 45% to 65%.
  • Eliminate the step-up in cost basis on inherited assets.
  • Add a 4% surtax on income over $5 million.
  • Cap itemized deductions to 28% of your income.
  • Create a capital gains schedule that requires an asset be held for 6 years to qualify for the lowest long-term capital gains rate of 20%. Increase capital gains taxes on assets held less than 6 years.
  • Increase the Social Security payroll tax from 12.4% to 15.2%.
  • Increase the payroll tax ceiling from $118,500 (2016) to $250,000. Or eliminate the cap altogether.
  • Apply the payroll tax to passive income, so business owners are taxed the same on distributions and dividends as they would be on salary.
  • A proposal in July from Ohio congressman James Renacci would lower the corporate income tax and add a consumption tax, or European-style VAT.
  • Limit the mortgage interest deduction, which disproportionately benefits wealthier home owners because it requires itemized deductions. One proposal is to replace the deduction with a smaller tax credit.
  • Place a cap on tax-deferred accounts. For example a 62-year old with $3.2 million in tax-deferred accounts would be ineligible to make further contributions. Other proposals suggest caps as low as $500,000.

Although this is an election year, I do not view this as a political issue. Whoever is elected to the Presidency and to Congress will have to deal with reducing deficits. While some candidates propose to cut taxes, this would dramatically increase the debt, which already stands at $19 Trillion. When interest rates eventually rise, a significant portion of our annual tax revenue could be needed solely for paying interest on our debt. So, I view tax cuts as not only unrealistic, but dangerously inflating a problem our children will ultimately have to bear.

If effective tax rates are going higher, what can you do to keep more of your investment return?

1) Tax efficiency will be more valuable. Using low-turnover ETFs, asset location, and tax loss harvesting can lower your tax liability. Reduce tax drag and keep gross income under $250,000, if possible. See: 6 Steps to Save on Investment Taxes.
2) Tax-free may be more preferable than tax-deferred. If you think your tax rate in retirement will be the same or higher than today, there is less benefit to investing in a Traditional 401(k) or IRA. Preference goes to the Roth 401(k) or Roth IRA. See: To Roth or Not to Roth.
3) Tax-free municipal bonds will be even more attractive when compared to taxable bonds.
4) Rather than allowing capital gains to accumulate for years and become an enormous tax bill in the future, it may be wise to harvest gains in years when you are in a lower tax bracket, up to the threshold of your current tax rate.
5) Don’t negate reduced tax rates for qualified dividends and long-term capital gains by placing those investments into an IRA or Annuity where the distributions will be taxed as ordinary income.

Do You Receive Mutual Fund Capital Gains Distributions?

I always ask prospective clients to bring a copy of their most recent tax return and often learn a wealth of information reviewing their taxes. In doing such a review last week, I noticed that in the previous year, a prospective client had to pay taxes on $13,875 in taxable capital gains distributions from their mutual funds.

If your mutual fund is inside of a 401(k) or IRA, capital gains distributions don’t matter. However, when a mutual fund is held in a taxable account, you end up paying taxes on capital gains distributions even though you didn’t sell the position. Instead, you are paying taxes for trading the fund manager does inside the portfolio, or worse, to provide liquidity to other shareholders, who sold before December and left you holding the bag to pay for their capital gains.

Luckily, there is a better way. In my previous position working with high net worth families, the majority of assets were held in taxable portfolios. We had a number of families with $10 million to over $100 million in investments with our firm. Needless to day, I spent considerable time in looking at ways to reduce taxes, and became very effective at the process of Portfolio Tax Optimization. I offer this same approach and benefits to my clients today.

Vanguard studied the value advisors bring through planning skills like tax optimixation. They estimate that “Advisor’s Alpha” can add as much as 3% a year to your net returns.
Link: Quantifying Vanguard Advisor’s Alpha

If you have significant assets in taxable accounts, I can help you. Here are five ways we can lower your taxes and allow you to keep more of your hard earned principal:

1) Use ETFs. The prospective client with $13,875 in capital gains distributions, had approximately $600,000 in mutual funds. I created a spreadsheet that calculated capital gains if they had been invested $600,000 in my 60/40 portfolio instead. Most of my holdings are Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs), which due to their unique structure, are much more tax efficient than mutual funds. In fact, my nine ETF holdings had total distributions of zero in the same year .

In the 60/40 model, we also had five mutual funds in categories where there are not equivalent ETFs. My calculation of capital gains distributions: $2,167. So, if we had been investing for this client, their capital gains distributions could have been reduced from approximately $14,000 to $2,000. The investment vehicles we choose matter!

I should note that this is just looking at capital gains distributions. Both ETFs and mutual funds also pay interest and dividends, which are taxable. There is more to managing taxes than just picking ETFs.

2) Asset Location. We could have further reduced taxes by choosing where to place each holding. Some funds generate interest, which is taxed as ordinary income, where as other funds generate qualified dividends, which is taxed at a lower rate of 15-20%. We place the funds with the greatest tax liability into your IRA or other qualified account, to reduce your overall tax burden. Funds that have little or no distributions are ideal for taxable accounts.

3) Avoid short-term capital gains. If you sell an investment within a year, those short-term gains are taxed as ordinary income, your highest tax rate. After 12 months, sales are treated as long-term capital gains, at a lower rate of 15-20%. We do not sell or rebalance funds before one year to avoid short-term gains. Unfortunately, many mutual fund managers don’t have any such tax mandate, so oftentimes, a significant portion of fund’s capital gains distributions are short-term.

4) Tax Loss Harvesting. At the end of each year, we review taxable portfolios for positions which have declined. We harvest those losses and immediately replace each position with a different fund in the same category (large cap, international, etc.). This fund swap allows us to use those losses to offset other gains or income, while maintaining our target asset allocation. If realized losses exceed gains, you can use $3,000 of losses to reduce ordinary income. Remaining losses are carried forward to future years.

5) Municipal Bonds. For investors in a higher tax bracket, your after-tax return may be better on tax-free municipal bonds than on taxable bond funds. However, an advisor will not know this without looking at your tax return and determining your tax bracket. That’s why we make planning our first priority, before making any investment recommendations. (Would you really trust anyone making investment recommendations without knowing your full situation? Are those recommendations designed to profit them or you?)

We take a disciplined approach to managing portfolios to minimize taxes, and it is a valuable benefit to be able to customize our approach for each individual client.

On this same client’s tax return, I realized that they did not deduct their Investment Management fees, a $6,000 miscellaneous deduction.
Link: Are Investment Advisory Fees Tax Deductible?

If you have taxable investments, we may be able to save you thousands, too. Let’s schedule a call today. You deserve a more sophisticated and efficient approach to managing your wealth.

Is Your Car Eligible for a $7,500 Tax Credit?

If you are in the market for a new vehicle, you may want to know about a tax credit available for the purchase an electric or plug-in hybrid vehicle. Worth up to $7,500, the credit is not a tax deduction from your income, but a dollar for dollar reduction in your federal income tax liability. In other words, if your tax bill was $19,000 and you have a $7,500 credit, you will pay only $11,500 and get the rest back.

This credit has been available since 2010, but in the last two years a significant number of new car models have become eligible for the tax credit. If you drive a lot of miles, these cars may be worth a look.

The credit includes 100% electric vehicles like the Tesla Model S or the Nissan Leaf, and it applies to the newer plug-in hybrid models, including the BMW i3, Chevrolet Volt, Ford C-Max Energi, Hyundai Sonata Plug-In Hybrid, and others. The credit does not apply to all hybrid vehicles, only those with plug-in technology. While the plug-in cars may be more expensive than regular hybrids, they are often less expensive once you factor in the tax credit.

The amount of the credit varies depending on the battery in the car, and may be less than $7,500. The credit is phased out for each manufacturer after they hit 200,000 eligible vehicles sold, with the credit falling to 50% and then to 25%. So, for those 400,000 people who put down a deposit on the Tesla Model 3, most will not be getting the full $7,500 tax credit. Only purchases of new vehicles – not used – are eligible for the credit.

The program is under Internal Revenue Code 30D; you can find full information on the IRS website here. An easier-to-read primer on the program is available at www.fueleconomy.gov.

Some states also offer tax credits or vouchers for the purchase of a plug-in hybrid or electric vehicle. Unfortunately, Texas is not one of those states! You can search for your state’s programs on the US Department of Energy website, the Alternative Fuels Data Center.

Do you have a plug-in hybrid or electric vehicle? Send me a note and tell me how you like it.

The Saver’s Tax Credit

Since most employers today no longer provide defined benefit pension plans for their employees, the burden of retirement saving has shifted to the employee. Not surprisingly, saving for retirement is a pretty low priority for the many Americans who are focused on how they are going to pay this month’s bills.

Avoiding Capital Gains in Real Estate

I’ve gotten a number of questions about Capital Gains and Real Estate recently, so I thought it was time for a post. While many home sellers do not have to pay any tax on the sale of their home, for others, capital gains taxes can be significant, even hundreds of thousands of dollars. Here are five ways to reduce capital gains when you sell real estate.

Are Investment Advisory Fees Tax Deductible?

 

It surprises me how few questions I receive about the tax deductibility of Investment Advisory fees. I hope that your CPA asks this question as they prepare your tax return, but I fear that some people miss this potential tax deduction. As with many tax rules, this one has quite a number of caveats. Here are three things you need to know:

1. First, we need to distinguish between Investment Advisory Fees (also called Investment Management Fees), Financial Planning Fees, and Commissions. Only Investment Advisory Fees are tax deductible. If you are a client, note that the fees charged by Good Life Wealth Management are Investment Advisory Fees.