More investors should be asking about how to invest when stocks are high. The first three quarters of 2024 were the best for the S&P 500 Index since 1997. But what is the outlook going forward for investors?

In a new paper by Goldman Sachs, they project that the return of the S&P 500 Index for the next 10 years, 2024-2034, will be only 3%. How did they reach this dismal projection? The model considers projected earnings growth, current valuations, interest rates, likely recessions, and stock market concentration.

How bad is it?

• The return would be in the worst 7% of 10-year returns since 1930.
• There is a 72% chance that the S&P 500 will do worse than a 10-year Treasury Bond.
• While their median projection is 3%, the 95% confidence range is between -1 and +7%.

The projections from Goldman are quite similar to the analysis from Vanguard. Currently, the Vanguard Capital Markets Model has a 10-year projection of 4.2% for US stocks. Both projections are very alarming, a far cry from the 11% annualized returns of the S&P 500 over the long-term.

Which Projections Matter?

In the short-term, markets are really impossible to predict. Long-term investors should not make portfolio decisions based on short-term projections. I remember one firm said there was a 100% chance of a recession in 2023. But it never happened. Short-Term predictions can be wrong and there are too many variables and surprises to consider. No one has a crystal ball and short-term predictions are about as accurate as guesses.

Long-term projections, however, may have some value in that there can be an eventual reversion to the mean. Periods of above average performance are often followed or preceded by below average performance. If you start with stocks being very expensive, then often the following decade has below average returns. And when you start with cheap stocks, like we had in 2003, March of 2009, or March of 2020, the following periods are typically above average.

Our approach is to ignore the noise of quarterly or annual projections. But we do position our portfolios towards the long-term trends of what the historical evidence suggests, based on today’s situation. We are not going to attempt to time the market, but we are going to listen to what market history tells us. Let’s talk about three ways investors can position their portfolios for a potentially low-return decade ahead.

Which Equities?

While both Goldman Sachs and Vanguard have low projections for the whole market, both also see opportunities in certain areas. The S&P 500 Index has been a great performer over the past decade, but other categories could do better over the next decade.

Goldman’s analysis believes that the current market concentration will be a major detractor from performance. What is market concentration? The biggest stocks have become the most overvalued, and the weighting of the largest 10 companies is exceptionally high today. While the regular, cap-weighted S&P 500 returns are projected at 3%, Goldman projects that the equal-weighted index could return 7%.

What is an equal weighted index? An equal weighted index invests the same dollar amount into each stock. If there are 500 stocks, each has a weight of 0.2%. And there is an easy solution here, because we can invest in an Equal Weighted Index fund.

Vanguard also expects better returns when we look outside of the US Growth segment. Here are their 10-year median return projections:

• US Growth: 1.1%
• US Value: 5.7%
• US Small Cap: 6.0%
• Developed ex-US stocks: 8.0%

This is why we diversify. Past performance is no guarantee of future returns. Even with the low projections for the entire market, there can be categories which could do better. This is the first strategy: diversify away from growth and cap-weighted indexes, and towards the areas with higher expected returns, such as equal-weight, value, small-cap, and international stocks.

DCA and Rebalancing

If you are a younger investor, I don’t want you to look at these reports and think you should forget about investing. The market will not go in a straight line over the next decade and there will undoubtedly be both large drops and large rallies. If you are investing monthly into your 401(k) or IRA, keep doing that. You are dollar cost averaging (DCA) and can benefit from all the volatility. Focus on your accumulation and diversify into low cost index funds in many categories.

For larger portfolios, even a relatively low-return environment can benefit from rebalancing and ongoing portfolio management. In fact, it is during long bull markets that rebalancing is the least helpful. In volatile markets, rebalancing allows us to benefit from the differences between stocks and bonds cycles. With rebalancing, we can sell stocks when they are high (like now) and buy stocks when they are low (like we did in March of 2020). This is part of our ongoing risk management process.

Bonds

Our third pillar of investing in a low-return environment is Bonds. Bonds are back. Our approach is to buy individual high-quality bonds and ladder them for five years. This means we have the bonds in place that will mature each year to meet the cash flow needs of our clients. For retirees, this means we do not have to touch our Equities to meet income requirements when the market is down. This gives us additional flexibility rather than always having to sell Equities to meet withdrawal needs. We want to create certainty with our bonds: income and capital preservation.

More conservative investors may find that this is an opportune time to overweight bonds and have more predictability in their portfolio. We can still get up to 5.4% on a 5-year fixed annuity today. That remains a compelling safe return. Most of the time, people are expecting to get 10% in the stock market. But if we are only expecting to get 3% to 5%, then it hardly seems worth it to take the gamble on stocks. Today, the expected return of a portfolio that is 80% stocks and 20% bonds is hardly different from one with 40% stocks and 60% bonds. Historically, those two portfolios are very different, but not today. Unfortunately, however. there will be a lot more volatility with 80% stocks than 40%.

High Stock Market Equals Low Returns

This can be a difficult lesson for investors to accept. Our natural tendency is to project the current returns into the future and assume the bull market continues. And maybe it will for a while longer. But long-term investors should understand that when the stock market is high that means projected returns are low.

Thankfully, we have a plan and our portfolios reflect the long-term outlook. We diversify into other categories with better expected returns. We dollar cost average and rebalance. And we consider the role and weighting of bonds for each client’s needs. There is no doubt that the projections from Goldman Sachs and Vanguard will prove to be imperfect. The future is always an unknown. Our plans will change, evolve, and adapt. But our focus will remain on doing our best work for planning and creating a portfolio strategy using the information, evidence, and research that is available.

Twice a year, Standard and Poor’s provides an analysis of why index funds are better than actively managed mutual funds. Their report is known as SPIVA, S&P Index Versus Active. It is compelling evidence that investors would be better off using index funds. We’re going to look at the most recent data, discuss the perils of fund benchmarks, and then explain our approach of using Factor-based strategies.

Most Funds Lag Their Benchmark

Looking at 2021, 79.6% of US stock funds did worse than the overall market, as measured by the S&P 1500 Composite Index. It was a spectacularly bad year for active managers, even worse than most years. I focus on the long-term results, which are fairly consistent from year to year. For the 10 years ending 12/31/2021, 86% of US stock funds under-performed the market. Some of the funds which did out-perform did so by taking on much more risk. When we consider risk-adjusted returns, 93% of funds lagged.

The data is compelling and persistent. 80% or more of actively managed funds cannot keep up with their index over 10 or 20 years. And since that is the time frame that matters for long-term investors, the odds are in your favor if you use index strategies rather than active funds. It is extremely difficult for active managers to beat the index. There are many thoughts why this is the case:

• Higher expenses. The cost of running a fund seems to wipe out any value they create through research and active management. Overall, market participants add up to the entire return of the stock market. That is the benchmark. But instead of being average (or actually Median) at 50%, the additional costs mean that 80% of funds trail the benchmark
• Chasing performance. Active managers pay too much for hot stocks and ignore cheap stocks which are out of favor. Or they miss the handful of top performing stocks which are often the biggest drivers of market returns. Stocks, categories, and sectors go in and out of favor.
• No information advantage. Today, analysts are smarter than ever and information is disseminated instantly online. The markets may have become so efficient that there are no “secret” stocks for active managers to uncover.
• The 10-20% of managers who do outperform may have done so through luck, as they are typically unable to sustain out-performance from one period to another. Do we have data for that? Yes. It’s the S&P Persistence Scorecard.

Which Benchmark?

There are a lot of benchmarks and unfortunately, this can be confusing for investors. Sometimes, we might be comparing a fund to the wrong benchmark and not be making the most accurate comparison. Consider, for example, the Fidelity Contrafund. At $126 Billion in assets, it is one of the most successful active funds in history. And over the last 10 years, it has slightly beat the S&P 500 Index: FCNTX is up 282% through April 22, 2022, compared to 279% for the Vanguard 500 (VOO).

Unfortunately, that’s not the most accurate benchmark, because the Contrafund is a Growth Fund. As a better benchmark, you could have been invested in the Vanguard 500 Growth Index (VOOG). And VOOG was up 333% over the past 10 years. In this case, the active fund actually trailed the correct benchmark by 50% over 10 years. With Growth strategies dominating over the past 10 years, a lot of Growth funds look good compared to the S&P 500. But when we consider a Growth benchmark, you probably would have been better off in the index fund. (And for taxable accounts, the after-tax return of active funds are very often much lower than an ETF.)

Here’s another poor benchmark situation. This week, I was comparing two US Low Volatility ETFs with very similar strategies: the SPDR Large Cap Low Volatility (LGLV) and the Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility (SPLV). Looking at a Morningstar report of 5-year performance, it showed that LGLV was in the 60th percentile while SPLV was better, at the 40th percentile. Unfortunately, the report was using two different benchmarks: large blend for LGLV and large value for SPLV. Their actual 5-year annualized returns were 14.01% for LGLV and 11.36% for SPLV. With different benchmarks, LGLV looked worse (60th percentile), even though it had actually out-performed SPLV by 2.65% a year! Which benchmark you use matters.

Using Factors To Look Forward

Although SPIVA shows why index funds are better, the harder part is deciding which index fund you want to invest in. You could just choose a World Index stock fund, like the Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). And I am confident you would do better than most active managers over the next 10 or 20 years.

But, we don’t invest in an “all-in-one” fund.

Rather, my role as a portfolio manager is to determine the asset allocation for each model and level of risk. We decide which categories we want to own (large growth, small value, emerging markets, etc.) and what percentage to invest in each category. And rather than looking backwards at performance, we use today’s valuations to evaluate future performance. Once we have an asset allocation model, I can select an index fund to use to fulfill each category. It starts with the blueprint, not the funds themselves.

Rather than using generic index funds like a Total World Index fund, we buy 5-8 Index funds that invest using a “factor” strategy. This is a quantitative way of sorting stocks, using a characteristic such as Value, Size, Quality, or Low Volatility. They represent an Index or Benchmark, but have an additional screen to create a portfolio with specific qualities. There is evidence that Factors can outperform a benchmark over time, but clearly, they do not do so every year.

Today, we are concerned about some stocks’ high valuations. We have tilted our portfolios away from the large cap growth and technology names which have had such terrific performance that their values are so expensive today. Some of these stocks, such as Facebook (now called “Meta”) are down 45% year to date. That’s what can happen when a stock becomes too expensive and the market winds change direction.

Instead, we are looking ahead in anticipation of a reversion to the mean in categories such as Value, Small Cap Value, International and Emerging Markets. That’s no prediction that any of these will be up this year, it’s a long-term proposition. When I look at the S&P 500 Index today and see how expensive some of the names have become, I find it hard to stomach. And so, we are looking for ways to take advantage of passive, low cost, tax-efficiency of ETFs, but in a smarter manner than just throwing it all in a generic, market cap weighted index fund.

Once we understand why index funds are better, we are still left with two questions. Which benchmark to use and how do we want to invest? We are fortunate today to have easy access to many low cost index funds. Factor-based funds can help us establish potentially positive characteristics to our portfolios even compared to regular index funds.

Let’s look ahead to 2022 and consider what investment themes we believe should be incorporated into our portfolio models. This process is not meant to be a prediction of whether markets will be up or down. I don’t think anyone can time the market successfully. (Here is my letter to clients from March 21, 2020 for reference.) Rather, my goal is to add value to our investment process in three ways.

One, we want to tilt towards areas of relative value. That means when one category is cheap and another is expensive, we want to have more of the cheap stocks and less of the expensive stocks. This sounds obvious, but many investors chase performance without regard to valuation. Inadvertently, they load up on expensive stocks. Tilting towards cheaper categories is inherently contrarian as we are often buying what has recently lagged.

Two, we aim to identify Satellite categories which are attractive under the current market environment. Unlike our Core positions, Satellite positions are temporary and may be removed in future years. Satellite investments are stocks or bonds in a smaller, more focused niche than our core funds. For example, a Floating Rate Bond fund would be a satellite fund, whereas an Investment Grade Bond Index fund would be a core position. We select satellite funds with the goal of enhancing returns.

Three, to diversify our portfolios better, we include Alternative investments. We are looking for investments outside of the usual stock and bond categories which might offer an acceptable return, but with low correlation to the risks of stock markets or interest rates. This could include Real Estate, Hedge Fund Strategies, Preferred Stocks, Convertible Bonds, Commodities, Managed Futures, etc. Typically, these provide some ballast when stocks have a Bear Market, so their primary purpose is to reduce risk, rather than to increase return.

Stocks in 2022

Today, we are looking at our investment themes for stocks for 2022; next week we will cover bonds and alternative investments. Needless to say, there is a lot of uncertainty about the stock market going into 2022. As investors, we have to come to terms with the fact that markets do not always provide us with a clear and obvious direction. Uncertainty is the normal state.

No one knows what will happen with the virus or with the Federal Reserve trying to slow inflation without hurting the economy. Those are the two big questions facing stock investors at the end of 2021. However, those are known unknowns. Often, markets are surprised more by the unknown unknowns – the risks we aren’t even considering right now.

Over the past 50 years, the S&P 500 Index was down 12 years, up 37 years, and exactly at 0% in 2011. The 10-year return of the S&P 500 is 16% a year. Being negative on stocks has proven to be a losing bet over time. Yes, you can lose money on stocks and past performance is no guarantee of future results. With that disclaimer, I see no reason to attempt to try to time the market today and withdraw from stocks.

Tilts: Value, International, Small

Here is what I am doing for 2022: weighing relative valuations between stock categories. There are stocks which have gone way up and are probably overvalued. But there are also stocks which have lagged and are relatively cheap. We can break this down three ways: Growth versus Value stocks, US versus International Stocks, and Large versus Small companies.

Growth has lead the markets for more than a decade. As a result, the spread between value and growth categories has widened to historic levels. In fact, the difference today between Value and Growth is equal to what it was during the Tech bubble in 1999. For 2022, we are increasing our tilt towards Value. While we have little in pure Growth funds, we will be reducing our cap weighted index funds, which have become concentrated in Growth names.

US Stocks have led international for a long-time and there is now a wide gap in valuations. US stocks, especially Growth, are expensive. Most US investors have a significant home bias. For 2022, we will shift a small percentage from US to International. We are already overweight in Emerging Markets, and are not adding to our positions in EM.

Small versus Large has been very interesting in 2021. In the US, Small Value has had a great year and looks promising for 2022. US Small Growth, however, lagged Large Growth by more than 20%. In other developed markets, small cap lagged large cap by a small amount. In Emerging Markets, small cap outperformed large cap by more than 20% year to date. There is not a uniform trend here, except that Small Value has done better than Small Growth. In terms of diversifying and looking for cheap stocks, our small cap selection will lean towards value rather than core or growth.

Taxes Matter

We will be making trades to our portfolios for 2022. Even after these trades, a 60/40 portfolio is still going to have about 60% in stocks and 40% in bonds. But the weightings of the positions will change slightly and some of the funds used may change. Our goal is to reduce risk and stay broadly diversified, while using low-cost investments that are transparent and have a good track record.

Throughout the process, we aim for tax efficiency. Changes are easy to incorporate in IRAs and that is always our first choice. In taxable accounts, we harvested losses in March of 2020, which carried forward to 2021. That can also allow us to make some changes without creating additional taxes for the year. And while I could automate the trading process, I am looking at this one client at a time, to do what is best for you, not easiest for me.

Next week, we will discuss our investment themes for 2022 for bonds and alternatives. Then we will be placing trades at the end of December and into January for most clients. I should note that even without making any changes to the portfolio models, we would still be looking to rebalance here at the end of the year. We will do both steps at the same time – rebalancing and any changes to the model – to avoid any unnecessary trades.

I examine investments all year round, but try to limit changes to once a year to avoid short-term trading. Each year, in the fourth quarter, I go through a process of reviewing all our holdings and our allocations. Here is what I wrote last year, looking ahead to 2021: Investment Themes for 2021

Have concerns about your investment portfolio or specific investments? Will your portfolio be sufficient to achieve your goals? How will you transition your accumulation portfolio to spending it down? These are uniquely individual questions and where our conversations can be the most valuable.

Let’s discuss some of the key year end tax planning strategies for 2021. It has been a remarkable year with markets soaring, inflation picking up, and the economy booming as we recover from the Pandemic crash last year. A year and a half ago, there were losses everywhere. Now, investors in stocks, real estate, cryptocurrency, and other assets are facing significant gains. Taxes are a major concern.

Here are 10 tax steps to consider before December 31.

Capital Gains Considerations

1. Beware of active mutual funds distributing large capital gains in December. If you have active funds in a taxable account, then make sure you are NOT reinvesting dividends. Better to take that cash and invest in a more efficient ETF or to rebalance.

2. Harvest losses, if you have any for 2021. We harvested losses via tax swaps last year and carried forward tremendous tax benefits into 2021 for our clients. This will help us as we look to rebalance portfolios at year-end.

3. If you are in the 12% tax bracket, your long-term capital gains rate is zero. You can harvest long-term gains and pay no tax. Rather than harvesting losses, you should harvest gains! Then, you can immediately buy back your ETF or fund and reset your cost basis higher. This will help protect you against future taxes. Don’t hold on to gains until future years.

Who is in the 12% bracket? For 2021, this includes single filers with taxable income under $40,525 and married filers under $81,050. Taxable income is after you subtract your standard deduction. So, add back the standard deduction of $12,550 for single or $25,100 married, and you could have gross income of up to $53,075 (single) or $106,150 (married).

4. If you anticipate you will itemize for 2021, bunch deductions as possible before the end of the year.

IRAs and Retirement Contributions

5. If you are able, increase your automatic contributions for 2022. While IRA contributions remain at $6,000 for 2022 ($7,000 if 50+), 401(k) contributions are increased to $20,500 or $27,000 if 50+. Health Savings Accounts are bumped up to $3,600 or $7,200 for a family.

6. Washington wants to eliminate the Backdoor Roth IRA. If you are eligible for 2021, I would do it right away. It may be gone in 2022!

7. Alternatively, if you are in a low tax bracket, consider making Roth Conversions before the end of the year to convert within your low bracket. The key to making this work is making small conversions over many years. Not sure how much to convert? Then let’s talk.

Giving Strategies

8. Even if you do not itemize, you can take an above-the-line deduction for a cash charitable donation of up to $300. For couples, this is doubled to $600. This is only for 2021. In 2022, you will have to itemize to deduct any charitable donation. Above this amount, we suggest donating appreciated securities from a taxable account rather than cash.

9. Consider using your annual gift tax exclusion of $15,000 for personal gifts or for funding a 529 Plan for 2021.

10. If you are 72 or older, don’t forget to complete your Required Minimum Distributions for 2022! Congress waived RMDs for 2020 but they are back this year. If you are over 70 1/2, you can make Qualified Charitable Distributions from your IRA which will count towards your RMD. Be sure to complete any QCDs by December 31.

These are 10 of our top ideas for year end tax planning 2021. I am constantly searching for ways to improve client’s tax situation and add value to their financial planning. I have been getting many new clients this year who are facing large tax bills in the years ahead! Many people aren’t thinking about the eventual taxes as they are building a portfolio or growing a 401(k). And then one day, they realize they have need some help in managing their life in a more tax-wise manner. If that’s you, we can help!